Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition)Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition)W3C Recommendation 16 August 2006, edited in place 29 September 2006
Please refer to the errata for this document, which may include some normative corrections. The previous errata for this document, are also available. See also translations. This document is also available in these non-normative formats: XML and XHTML with color-coded revision indicators. Copyright © 2006 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark and document use rules apply. AbstractThe Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a subset of SGML that is completely described in this document. Its goal is to enable generic SGML to be served, received, and processed on the Web in the way that is now possible with HTML. XML has been designed for ease of implementation and for interoperability with both SGML and HTML. Status of this DocumentThis section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/. This document specifies a syntax created by subsetting an existing, widely used international text processing standard (Standard Generalized Markup Language, ISO 8879:1986(E) as amended and corrected) for use on the World Wide Web. It is a product of the XML Core Working Group as part of the XML Activity. On 29 September 2006 this document was edited in place to remove a number of spurious and potentially misleading spaces. The English version of this specification is the only normative version. However, for translations of this document, see http://www.w3.org/2003/03/Translations/byTechnology?technology=xml. This document is a W3C Recommendation. This fourth edition is not a new version of XML. As a convenience to readers, it incorporates the changes dictated by the accumulated errata (available at http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-3e-errata) to the Third Edition of XML 1.0, dated 4 February 2004. In addition, the markup introduced in the third edition, to clarify when prescriptive keywords are used in the formal sense defined in [IETF RFC 2119], has been modified to better match the intent of [IETF RFC 2119]. This edition supersedes the previous W3C Recommendation of 4 February 2004. Please report errors in this document to the public xml-editor@w3.org mailing list; archives are available. For the convenience of readers, an XHTML version with color-coded revision indicators is also provided; this version highlights each change due to an erratum published in the errata list, together with a link to the particular erratum in that list. Most of the errata in the list provide a rationale for the change. The errata list for this fourth edition is available at http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-4e-errata. An implementation report is available at http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/06/xml10-4e-implementation.html. A Test Suite is maintained to help assessing conformance to this specification. This document has been reviewed by W3C Members, by software developers, and by other W3C groups and interested parties, and is endorsed by the Director as a W3C Recommendation. It is a stable document and may be used as reference material or cited from another document. W3C's role in making the Recommendation is to draw attention to the specification and to promote its widespread deployment. This enhances the functionality and interoperability of the Web. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy. Table of Contents1 Introduction AppendicesA References 1 IntroductionExtensible Markup Language, abbreviated XML, describes a class of data objects called XML documents and partially describes the behavior of computer programs which process them. XML is an application profile or restricted form of SGML, the Standard Generalized Markup Language [ISO 8879]. By construction, XML documents are conforming SGML documents. XML documents are made up of storage units called entities, which contain either parsed or unparsed data. Parsed data is made up of characters, some of which form character data, and some of which form markup. Markup encodes a description of the document's storage layout and logical structure. XML provides a mechanism to impose constraints on the storage layout and logical structure. [Definition: A software module called an XML processor is used to read XML documents and provide access to their content and structure.] [Definition: It is assumed that an XML processor is doing its work on behalf of another module, called the application.] This specification describes the required behavior of an XML processor in terms of how it must read XML data and the information it must provide to the application. 1.1 Origin and GoalsXML was developed by an XML Working Group (originally known as the SGML Editorial Review Board) formed under the auspices of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) in 1996. It was chaired by Jon Bosak of Sun Microsystems with the active participation of an XML Special Interest Group (previously known as the SGML Working Group) also organized by the W3C. The membership of the XML Working Group is given in an appendix. Dan Connolly served as the Working Group's contact with the W3C. The design goals for XML are:
This specification, together with associated standards (Unicode [Unicode] and ISO/IEC 10646 [ISO/IEC 10646] for characters, Internet RFC 3066 [IETF RFC 3066] for language identification tags, ISO 639 [ISO 639] for language name codes, and ISO 3166 [ISO 3166] for country name codes), provides all the information necessary to understand XML Version 1.0 and construct computer programs to process it. This version of the XML specification may be distributed freely, as long as all text and legal notices remain intact. 1.2 TerminologyThe terminology used to describe XML documents is defined in the body of this specification. The key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL, when EMPHASIZED, are to be interpreted as described in [IETF RFC 2119]. In addition, the terms defined in the following list are used in building those definitions and in describing the actions of an XML processor:
2 Documents[Definition: A data object is an XML document if it is well-formed, as defined in this specification. In addition, the XML document is valid if it meets certain further constraints.] Each XML document has both a logical and a physical structure. Physically, the document is composed of units called entities. An entity may refer to other entities to cause their inclusion in the document. A document begins in a "root" or document entity. Logically, the document is composed of declarations, elements, comments, character references, and processing instructions, all of which are indicated in the document by explicit markup. The logical and physical structures MUST nest properly, as described in 4.3.2 Well-Formed Parsed Entities. 2.1 Well-Formed XML Documents[Definition: A textual object is a well-formed XML document if:]
Document
Matching the document production implies that:
[Definition: As a consequence of this,
for each non-root element 2.2 Characters[Definition: A parsed entity contains text, a sequence of characters, which may represent markup or character data.] [Definition: A character is an atomic unit of text as specified by ISO/IEC 10646:2000 [ISO/IEC 10646]. Legal characters are tab, carriage return, line feed, and the legal characters of Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646. The versions of these standards cited in A.1 Normative References were current at the time this document was prepared. New characters may be added to these standards by amendments or new editions. Consequently, XML processors MUST accept any character in the range specified for Char. ] Character Range
The mechanism for encoding character code points into bit patterns may vary from entity to entity. All XML processors MUST accept the UTF-8 and UTF-16 encodings of Unicode 3.1 [Unicode3]; the mechanisms for signaling which of the two is in use, or for bringing other encodings into play, are discussed later, in 4.3.3 Character Encoding in Entities. Note: Document authors are encouraged to avoid "compatibility characters", as defined in section 6.8 of [Unicode] (see also D21 in section 3.6 of [Unicode3]). The characters defined in the following ranges are also discouraged. They are either control characters or permanently undefined Unicode characters: [#x7F-#x84], [#x86-#x9F], [#xFDD0-#xFDDF], [#x1FFFE-#x1FFFF], [#x2FFFE-#x2FFFF], [#x3FFFE-#x3FFFF], [#x4FFFE-#x4FFFF], [#x5FFFE-#x5FFFF], [#x6FFFE-#x6FFFF], [#x7FFFE-#x7FFFF], [#x8FFFE-#x8FFFF], [#x9FFFE-#x9FFFF], [#xAFFFE-#xAFFFF], [#xBFFFE-#xBFFFF], [#xCFFFE-#xCFFFF], [#xDFFFE-#xDFFFF], [#xEFFFE-#xEFFFF], [#xFFFFE-#xFFFFF], [#x10FFFE-#x10FFFF]. 2.3 Common Syntactic ConstructsThis section defines some symbols used widely in the grammar. S (white space) consists of one or more space (#x20) characters, carriage returns, line feeds, or tabs. White Space
Note: The presence of #xD in the above production is maintained purely for backward compatibility with the First Edition. As explained in 2.11 End-of-Line Handling, all #xD characters literally present in an XML document are either removed or replaced by #xA characters before any other processing is done. The only way to get a #xD character to match this production is to use a character reference in an entity value literal. Characters are classified for convenience as letters, digits, or other characters. A letter consists of an alphabetic or syllabic base character or an ideographic character. Full definitions of the specific characters in each class are given in B Character Classes.
[Definition: A Name is a token beginning
with a letter or one of a few punctuation characters, and continuing with
letters, digits, hyphens, underscores, colons, or full stops, together known
as name characters.] Names beginning with the string " Note: The Namespaces in XML Recommendation [XML Names] assigns a meaning to names containing colon characters. Therefore, authors should not use the colon in XML names except for namespace purposes, but XML processors must accept the colon as a name character. An Nmtoken (name token) is any mixture of name characters. Names and Tokens
Note: The Names and Nmtokens productions are used to define the validity of tokenized attribute values after normalization (see 3.3.1 Attribute Types). Literal data is any quoted string not containing the quotation mark used as a delimiter for that string. Literals are used for specifying the content of internal entities (EntityValue), the values of attributes (AttValue), and external identifiers (SystemLiteral). Note that a SystemLiteral can be parsed without scanning for markup. Literals
Note: Although
the EntityValue production allows the definition
of a general entity consisting of a single explicit 2.4 Character Data and MarkupText consists of intermingled character data and markup. [Definition: Markup takes the form of start-tags, end-tags, empty-element tags, entity references, character references, comments, CDATA section delimiters, document type declarations, processing instructions, XML declarations, text declarations, and any white space that is at the top level of the document entity (that is, outside the document element and not inside any other markup).] [Definition: All text that is not markup constitutes the character data of the document.] The ampersand character (&) and the left angle bracket (<) MUST NOT appear
in their literal form, except when used as markup delimiters, or
within a comment, a processing
instruction, or a CDATA section.
If they are needed elsewhere, they MUST be escaped
using either numeric character references
or the strings " In the content of elements, character data is any string of characters
which does not contain the start-delimiter of any markup and does not include the CDATA-section-close
delimiter, " To allow attribute values to contain both single and double quotes, the
apostrophe or single-quote character (') may be represented as " Character Data
2.5 Comments
[Definition:
Comments may appear
anywhere in a document outside other markup;
in addition, they may appear within the document type declaration at places
allowed by the grammar. They are not part of the document's character
data; an XML processor MAY, but need not, make it possible for an
application to retrieve the text of comments. For
compatibility, the string " Comments
An example of a comment: Note
that the grammar does not allow a comment ending in 2.6 Processing Instructions[Definition: Processing instructions (PIs) allow documents to contain instructions for applications.] Processing Instructions
PIs are not part of the document's character
data, but MUST be passed through to the application. The PI begins
with a target (PITarget) used to identify the application
to which the instruction is directed. The target names " 2.7 CDATA Sections
[Definition:
CDATA sections may occur anywhere character data may occur; they are used to escape blocks
of text containing characters which would otherwise be recognized as markup.
CDATA sections begin with the string " CDATA Sections
Within a CDATA section, only the CDEnd string is
recognized as markup, so that left angle brackets and ampersands may occur
in their literal form; they need not (and cannot) be escaped using " An example of a CDATA section, in which " Hello, world!]]> 2.8 Prolog and Document Type Declaration[Definition: XML documents SHOULD begin with an XML declaration which specifies the version of XML being used.] For example, the following is a complete XML document, well-formed but not valid:
and so is this:
The function of the markup in an XML document is to describe its storage and logical structure and to associate attribute name-value pairs with its logical structures. XML provides a mechanism, the document type declaration, to define constraints on the logical structure and to support the use of predefined storage units. [Definition: An XML document is valid if it has an associated document type declaration and if the document complies with the constraints expressed in it.] The document type declaration MUST appear before the first element in the document. Prolog
[Definition: The XML document type declaration contains or points to markup declarations that provide a grammar for a class of documents. This grammar is known as a document type definition, or DTD. The document type declaration can point to an external subset (a special kind of external entity) containing markup declarations, or can contain the markup declarations directly in an internal subset, or can do both. The DTD for a document consists of both subsets taken together.] [Definition: A markup declaration is an element type declaration, an attribute-list declaration, an entity declaration, or a notation declaration.] These declarations may be contained in whole or in part within parameter entities, as described in the well-formedness and validity constraints below. For further information, see 4 Physical Structures. Document Type Definition
Note that it is possible to construct a well-formed document containing a doctypedecl that neither points to an external subset nor contains an internal subset. The markup declarations may be made up in whole or in part of the replacement text of parameter entities. The productions later in this specification for individual nonterminals (elementdecl, AttlistDecl, and so on) describe the declarations after all the parameter entities have been included. Parameter entity references are recognized anywhere in the DTD (internal and external subsets and external parameter entities), except in literals, processing instructions, comments, and the contents of ignored conditional sections (see 3.4 Conditional Sections). They are also recognized in entity value literals. The use of parameter entities in the internal subset is restricted as described below. Validity constraint: Root Element Type The Name in the document type declaration MUST match the element type of the root element. Validity constraint: Proper Declaration/PE Nesting Parameter-entity replacement text MUST be properly nested with markup declarations. That is to say, if either the first character or the last character of a markup declaration (markupdecl above) is contained in the replacement text for a parameter-entity reference, both MUST be contained in the same replacement text. Well-formedness constraint: PEs in Internal Subset In the internal DTD subset, parameter-entity references MUST NOT occur within markup declarations; they may occur where markup declarations can occur. (This does not apply to references that occur in external parameter entities or to the external subset.) Well-formedness constraint: External Subset The external subset, if any, MUST match the production for extSubset. Well-formedness constraint: PE Between Declarations The replacement text of a parameter entity reference in a DeclSep MUST match the production extSubsetDecl. Like the internal subset, the external subset and any external parameter entities referenced in a DeclSep MUST consist of a series of complete markup declarations of the types allowed by the non-terminal symbol markupdecl, interspersed with white space or parameter-entity references. However, portions of the contents of the external subset or of these external parameter entities may conditionally be ignored by using the conditional section construct; this is not allowed in the internal subset but is allowed in external parameter entities referenced in the internal subset. External Subset
The external subset and external parameter entities also differ from the internal subset in that in them, parameter-entity references are permitted within markup declarations, not only between markup declarations. An example of an XML document with a document type declaration:
The system identifier
" The declarations can also be given locally, as in this example: ]> If both the external and internal subsets are used, the internal subset MUST be considered to occur before the external subset. This has the effect that entity and attribute-list declarations in the internal subset take precedence over those in the external subset. 2.9 Standalone Document DeclarationMarkup declarations can affect the content of the document, as passed from an XML processor to an application; examples are attribute defaults and entity declarations. The standalone document declaration, which may appear as a component of the XML declaration, signals whether or not there are such declarations which appear external to the document entity or in parameter entities. [Definition: An external markup declaration is defined as a markup declaration occurring in the external subset or in a parameter entity (external or internal, the latter being included because non-validating processors are not required to read them).] Standalone Document Declaration
In a standalone document declaration, the value "yes" indicates that there are no external markup declarations which affect the information passed from the XML processor to the application. The value "no" indicates that there are or may be such external markup declarations. Note that the standalone document declaration only denotes the presence of external declarations; the presence, in a document, of references to external entities, when those entities are internally declared, does not change its standalone status. If there are no external markup declarations, the standalone document declaration has no meaning. If there are external markup declarations but there is no standalone document declaration, the value "no" is assumed. Any XML document for which Validity constraint: Standalone Document Declaration The standalone document declaration MUST have the value "no" if any external markup declarations contain declarations of:
An example XML declaration with a standalone document declaration: 2.10 White Space HandlingIn editing XML documents, it is often convenient to use "white space" (spaces, tabs, and blank lines) to set apart the markup for greater readability. Such white space is typically not intended for inclusion in the delivered version of the document. On the other hand, "significant" white space that should be preserved in the delivered version is common, for example in poetry and source code. An XML processor MUST always pass all characters in a document that are not markup through to the application. A validating XML processor MUST also inform the application which of these characters constitute white space appearing in element content. A special attribute named The value "default" signals that applications' default white-space
processing modes are acceptable for this element; the value "preserve"
indicates the intent that applications preserve all the white space. This
declared intent is considered to apply to all elements within the content
of the element where it is specified, unless overridden with
another instance of the The root element of any document is considered to have signaled no intentions as regards application space handling, unless it provides a value for this attribute or the attribute is declared with a default value. 2.11 End-of-Line HandlingXML parsed entities are often stored in computer files which, for editing convenience, are organized into lines. These lines are typically separated by some combination of the characters CARRIAGE RETURN (#xD) and LINE FEED (#xA). To simplify the tasks of applications, the XML processor MUST behave as if it normalized all line breaks in external parsed entities (including the document entity) on input, before parsing, by translating both the two-character sequence #xD #xA and any #xD that is not followed by #xA to a single #xA character. 2.12 Language IdentificationIn document processing, it is often useful to identify the natural or formal
language in which the content is written. A special attribute
named (Productions 33 through 38 have been removed.) For example:
The
language specified by
Note: Language information may also be provided by external transport protocols (e.g. HTTP or
MIME). When available, this information may be used by XML applications, but the more local
information provided by A simple declaration for xml:lang CDATA #IMPLIED but specific default values may also be given, if appropriate. In a collection
of French poems for English students, with glosses and notes in English, the 3 Logical Structures[Definition: Each XML document contains one or more elements, the boundaries of which are either delimited by start-tags and end-tags, or, for empty elements, by an empty-element tag. Each element has a type, identified by name, sometimes called its "generic identifier" (GI), and may have a set of attribute specifications.] Each attribute specification has a name and a value. Element
This specification does not constrain the
application semantics, use, or (beyond syntax)
names of the element types and attributes, except that names beginning with
a match to Well-formedness constraint: Element Type Match The Name in an element's end-tag MUST match the element type in the start-tag. Validity constraint: Element Valid An element is valid if there is a declaration matching elementdecl where the Name matches the element type, and one of the following holds:
3.1 Start-Tags, End-Tags, and Empty-Element Tags[Definition: The beginning of every non-empty XML element is marked by a start-tag.] Start-tag
The Name in the start- and end-tags gives the element's type. [Definition: The Name-AttValue
pairs are referred to as the attribute specifications of the
element], [Definition: with the Name in each pair referred to as the attribute name
]
and [Definition: the content of the AttValue (the text between the Well-formedness constraint: Unique Att Spec An attribute name MUST NOT appear more than once in the same start-tag or empty-element tag. Validity constraint: Attribute Value Type The attribute MUST have been declared; the value MUST be of the type declared for it. (For attribute types, see 3.3 Attribute-List Declarations.) Well-formedness constraint: No External Entity References Attribute values MUST NOT contain direct or indirect entity references to external entities. Well-formedness constraint: No The replacement text of any entity
referred to directly or indirectly in an attribute value MUST NOT contain a An example of a start-tag: [Definition: The end of every element that begins with a start-tag MUST be marked by an end-tag containing a name that echoes the element's type as given in the start-tag:] End-tag
An example of an end-tag: [Definition: The text between the start-tag and end-tag is called the element's content:] Content of Elements
[Definition: An element with no content is said to be empty.] The representation of an empty element is either a start-tag immediately followed by an end-tag, or an empty-element tag. [Definition: An empty-element tag takes a special form:] Tags for Empty Elements
Empty-element tags may be used for any element which has no content, whether or not it is declared using the keyword EMPTY. For interoperability, the empty-element tag SHOULD be used, and SHOULD only be used, for elements which are declared EMPTY. Examples of empty elements: 3.2 Element Type DeclarationsThe element structure of an XML document may, for validation purposes, be constrained using element type and attribute-list declarations. An element type declaration constrains the element's content. Element type declarations often constrain which element types can appear as children of the element. At user option, an XML processor MAY issue a warning when a declaration mentions an element type for which no declaration is provided, but this is not an error. [Definition: An element type declaration takes the form:] Element Type Declaration
where the Name gives the element type being declared. Validity constraint: Unique Element Type Declaration An element type MUST NOT be declared more than once. Examples of element type declarations: 3.2.1 Element Content[Definition: An element type has element content when elements of that type MUST contain only child elements (no character data), optionally separated by white space (characters matching the nonterminal S).] [Definition: In this case, the constraint includes a content model, a simple grammar governing the allowed types of the child elements and the order in which they are allowed to appear.] The grammar is built on content particles (cps), which consist of names, choice lists of content particles, or sequence lists of content particles: Element-content Models
where each Name is the type of an element which
may appear as a child. Any content
particle in a choice list may appear in the element
content at the location where the choice list appears in the grammar;
content particles occurring in a sequence list MUST each appear in the element content in the order given in the list.
The optional character following a name or list governs whether the element
or the content particles in the list may occur one or more ( The content of an element matches a content model if and only if it is possible to trace out a path through the content model, obeying the sequence, choice, and repetition operators and matching each element in the content against an element type in the content model. For compatibility, it is an error if the content model allows an element to match more than one occurrence of an element type in the content model. For more information, see E Deterministic Content Models. Validity constraint: Proper Group/PE Nesting Parameter-entity replacement text MUST be properly nested with parenthesized groups. That is to say, if either of the opening or closing parentheses in a choice, seq, or Mixed construct is contained in the replacement text for a parameter entity, both MUST be contained in the same replacement text.
For interoperability, if a parameter-entity reference
appears in a choice, seq, or Mixed construct, its replacement text SHOULD contain at
least one non-blank character, and neither the first nor last non-blank character
of the replacement text SHOULD be a connector ( Examples of element-content models: 3.2.2 Mixed Content[Definition: An element type has mixed content when elements of that type may contain character data, optionally interspersed with child elements.] In this case, the types of the child elements may be constrained, but not their order or their number of occurrences: Mixed-content Declaration
where the Names give the types of elements that may appear as children. The keyword #PCDATA derives historically from the term "parsed character data." Validity constraint: No Duplicate Types The same name MUST NOT appear more than once in a single mixed-content declaration. Examples of mixed content declarations: 3.3 Attribute-List DeclarationsAttributes are used to associate name-value pairs with elements. Attribute specifications MUST NOT appear outside of start-tags and empty-element tags; thus, the productions used to recognize them appear in 3.1 Start-Tags, End-Tags, and Empty-Element Tags. Attribute-list declarations may be used:
[Definition: Attribute-list declarations specify the name, data type, and default value (if any) of each attribute associated with a given element type:] Attribute-list Declaration
The Name in the AttlistDecl rule is the type of an element. At user option, an XML processor MAY issue a warning if attributes are declared for an element type not itself declared, but this is not an error. The Name in the AttDef rule is the name of the attribute. When more than one AttlistDecl is provided for a given element type, the contents of all those provided are merged. When more than one definition is provided for the same attribute of a given element type, the first declaration is binding and later declarations are ignored. For interoperability, writers of DTDs may choose to provide at most one attribute-list declaration for a given element type, at most one attribute definition for a given attribute name in an attribute-list declaration, and at least one attribute definition in each attribute-list declaration. For interoperability, an XML processor MAY at user option issue a warning when more than one attribute-list declaration is provided for a given element type, or more than one attribute definition is provided for a given attribute, but this is not an error. 3.3.1 Attribute TypesXML attribute types are of three kinds: a string type, a set of tokenized types, and enumerated types. The string type may take any literal string as a value; the tokenized types are more constrained. The validity constraints noted in the grammar are applied after the attribute value has been normalized as described in 3.3.3 Attribute-Value Normalization. Attribute Types
Values of type ID MUST match the Name production. A name MUST NOT appear more than once in an XML document as a value of this type; i.e., ID values MUST uniquely identify the elements which bear them. Validity constraint: One ID per Element Type An element type MUST NOT have more than one ID attribute specified. Validity constraint: ID Attribute Default An ID attribute MUST have a declared default of #IMPLIED or #REQUIRED. Values of type IDREF MUST match the Name production, and values of type IDREFS MUST match Names; each Name MUST match the value of an ID attribute on some element in the XML document; i.e. IDREF values MUST match the value of some ID attribute. Validity constraint: Entity Name Values of type ENTITY MUST match the Name production, values of type ENTITIES MUST match Names; each Name MUST match the name of an unparsed entity declared in the DTD. Validity constraint: Name Token Values of type NMTOKEN MUST match the Nmtoken production; values of type NMTOKENS MUST match Nmtokens. [Definition: Enumerated attributes have a list of allowed values in their declaration ]. They MUST take one of those values. There are two kinds of enumerated attribute types: Enumerated Attribute Types
A NOTATION attribute identifies a notation, declared in the DTD with associated system and/or public identifiers, to be used in interpreting the element to which the attribute is attached. Validity constraint: Notation Attributes Values of this type MUST match one of the notation names included in the declaration; all notation names in the declaration MUST be declared. Validity constraint: One Notation Per Element Type An element type MUST NOT have more than one NOTATION attribute specified. Validity constraint: No Notation on Empty Element For compatibility, an attribute of type NOTATION MUST NOT be declared on an element declared EMPTY. Validity constraint: No Duplicate Tokens The notation names in a single NotationType attribute declaration, as well as the NmTokens in a single Enumeration attribute declaration, MUST all be distinct. Validity constraint: Enumeration Values of this type MUST match one of the Nmtoken tokens in the declaration. For interoperability, the same Nmtoken SHOULD NOT occur more than once in the enumerated attribute types of a single element type. 3.3.2 Attribute DefaultsAn attribute declaration provides information on whether the attribute's presence is REQUIRED, and if not, how an XML processor is to react if a declared attribute is absent in a document. Attribute Defaults
In an attribute declaration, #REQUIRED means that the attribute MUST always be provided, #IMPLIED that no default value is provided. [Definition: If the declaration is neither #REQUIRED nor #IMPLIED, then the AttValue value contains the declared default value; the #FIXED keyword states that the attribute MUST always have the default value. When an XML processor encounters an element without a specification for an attribute for which it has read a default value declaration, it MUST report the attribute with the declared default value to the application.] Validity constraint: Required Attribute If the default declaration is the keyword #REQUIRED, then the attribute MUST be specified for all elements of the type in the attribute-list declaration. Validity constraint: Attribute Default Value Syntactically Correct The declared default value MUST meet the syntactic constraints of the declared attribute type. That is, the default value of an attribute:
Note that only the syntactic constraints of the type are required here; other constraints (e.g. that the value be the name of a declared unparsed entity, for an attribute of type ENTITY) will be reported by a validating parser only if an element without a specification for this attribute actually occurs. Validity constraint: Fixed Attribute Default If an attribute has a default value declared with the #FIXED keyword, instances of that attribute MUST match the default value. Examples of attribute-list declarations: 3.3.3 Attribute-Value NormalizationBefore the value of an attribute is passed to the application or checked for validity, the XML processor MUST normalize the attribute value by applying the algorithm below, or by using some other method such that the value passed to the application is the same as that produced by the algorithm.
If the attribute type is not CDATA, then the XML processor MUST further process the normalized attribute value by discarding any leading and trailing space (#x20) characters, and by replacing sequences of space (#x20) characters by a single space (#x20) character. Note that if the unnormalized attribute value contains a character reference to a white space character other than space (#x20), the normalized value contains the referenced character itself (#xD, #xA or #x9). This contrasts with the case where the unnormalized value contains a white space character (not a reference), which is replaced with a space character (#x20) in the normalized value and also contrasts with the case where the unnormalized value contains an entity reference whose replacement text contains a white space character; being recursively processed, the white space character is replaced with a space character (#x20) in the normalized value. All attributes for which no declaration has been read SHOULD be treated by a non-validating processor as if declared CDATA. It is an error if an attribute value contains a reference to an entity for which no declaration has been read. Following are examples of attribute normalization. Given the following declarations: the attribute specifications in the left column below would be normalized
to the character sequences of the middle column if the attribute
Note that the last example is invalid (but well-formed) if 3.4 Conditional Sections[Definition: Conditional sections are portions of the document type declaration external subset or of external parameter entities which are included in, or excluded from, the logical structure of the DTD based on the keyword which governs them.] Conditional Section
Validity constraint: Proper Conditional Section/PE Nesting If any of the " Like the internal and external DTD subsets, a conditional section may contain one or more complete declarations, comments, processing instructions, or nested conditional sections, intermingled with white space. If the keyword of the conditional section is INCLUDE, then the
contents of the conditional section MUST be
processed as part of the DTD. If the keyword of
the conditional section is IGNORE, then the contents of the conditional
section MUST
NOT be processed as part of the DTD.
If a conditional section with a keyword of INCLUDE occurs within
a larger conditional section with a keyword of IGNORE, both the outer
and the inner conditional sections MUST be ignored. The contents
of an ignored conditional section MUST be parsed by ignoring all characters after
the " If the keyword of the conditional section is a parameter-entity reference, the parameter entity MUST be replaced by its content before the processor decides whether to include or ignore the conditional section. An example: ]]> ]]> 4 Physical Structures[Definition: An XML document may consist of one or many storage units. These are called entities; they all have content and are all (except for the document entity and the external DTD subset) identified by entity name.] Each XML document has one entity called the document entity, which serves as the starting point for the XML processor and may contain the whole document. Entities may be either parsed or unparsed. [Definition: The contents of a parsed entity are referred to as its replacement text; this text is considered an integral part of the document.] [Definition: An unparsed entity is a resource whose contents may or may not be text, and if text, may be other than XML. Each unparsed entity has an associated notation, identified by name. Beyond a requirement that an XML processor make the identifiers for the entity and notation available to the application, XML places no constraints on the contents of unparsed entities.] Parsed entities are invoked by name using entity references; unparsed entities by name, given in the value of ENTITY or ENTITIES attributes. [Definition: General entities are entities for use within the document content. In this specification, general entities are sometimes referred to with the unqualified term entity when this leads to no ambiguity.] [Definition: Parameter entities are parsed entities for use within the DTD.] These two types of entities use different forms of reference and are recognized in different contexts. Furthermore, they occupy different namespaces; a parameter entity and a general entity with the same name are two distinct entities. 4.1 Character and Entity References[Definition: A character reference refers to a specific character in the ISO/IEC 10646 character set, for example one not directly accessible from available input devices.] Character Reference
Well-formedness constraint: Legal Character Characters referred to using character references MUST match the production for Char. If the character reference begins with "
[Definition: An entity reference
refers to the content of a named entity.]
[Definition: References to parsed general entities use
ampersand ( Entity Reference
Well-formedness constraint: Entity Declared In a document
without any DTD, a document with only an internal DTD subset which contains
no parameter entity references, or a document with " Note that non-validating processors are not obligated to to read and process entity declarations occurring in parameter entities or in the external subset; for such documents, the rule that an entity must be declared is a well-formedness constraint only if standalone='yes'. Validity constraint: Entity Declared In a document with an external subset or parameter
entity references with
" Well-formedness constraint: Parsed Entity An entity reference MUST NOT contain the name of an unparsed entity. Unparsed entities may be referred to only in attribute values declared to be of type ENTITY or ENTITIES. Well-formedness constraint: No Recursion A parsed entity MUST NOT contain a recursive reference to itself, either directly or indirectly. Well-formedness constraint: In DTD Parameter-entity references MUST NOT appear outside the DTD. Examples of character and entity references: Type Example of a parameter-entity reference: %ISOLat2; 4.2 Entity Declarations[Definition: Entities are declared thus:] Entity Declaration
The Name identifies the entity in an entity reference or, in the case of an unparsed entity, in the value of an ENTITY or ENTITIES attribute. If the same entity is declared more than once, the first declaration encountered is binding; at user option, an XML processor MAY issue a warning if entities are declared multiple times. 4.2.1 Internal Entities[Definition: If the entity definition is an EntityValue, the defined entity is called an internal entity. There is no separate physical storage object, and the content of the entity is given in the declaration.] Note that some processing of entity and character references in the literal entity value may be required to produce the correct replacement text: see 4.5 Construction of Entity Replacement Text. An internal entity is a parsed entity. Example of an internal entity declaration: 4.2.2 External Entities[Definition: If the entity is not internal, it is an external entity, declared as follows:] External Entity Declaration
If the NDataDecl is present, this is a general unparsed entity; otherwise it is a parsed entity.
[Definition: The SystemLiteral is called the entity's system
identifier. It is meant to be converted to a URI reference
(as defined in [IETF RFC 3986]),
as part of the
process of dereferencing it to obtain input for the XML processor to construct the
entity's replacement text.] It is an error for a fragment identifier
(beginning with a System identifiers (and other XML strings meant to be used as URI references) may contain characters that, according to [IETF RFC 3986], must be escaped before a URI can be used to retrieve the referenced resource. The characters to be escaped are the control characters #x0 to #x1F and #x7F (most of which cannot appear in XML), space #x20, the delimiters '<' #x3C, '>' #x3E and '"' #x22, the unwise characters '{' #x7B, '}' #x7D, '|' #x7C, '\' #x5C, '^' #x5E and '`' #x60, as well as all characters above #x7F. Since escaping is not always a fully reversible process, it MUST be performed only when absolutely necessary and as late as possible in a processing chain. In particular, neither the process of converting a relative URI to an absolute one nor the process of passing a URI reference to a process or software component responsible for dereferencing it SHOULD trigger escaping. When escaping does occur, it MUST be performed as follows:
[Definition: In addition to a system identifier, an external identifier may include a public identifier.] An XML processor attempting to retrieve the entity's content may use any combination of the public and system identifiers as well as additional information outside the scope of this specification to try to generate an alternative URI reference. If the processor is unable to do so, it MUST use the URI reference specified in the system literal. Before a match is attempted, all strings of white space in the public identifier MUST be normalized to single space characters (#x20), and leading and trailing white space MUST be removed. Examples of external entity declarations: 4.3 Parsed Entities4.3.1 The Text DeclarationExternal parsed entities SHOULD each begin with a text declaration. Text Declaration
The text declaration MUST be provided literally, not by reference to a parsed entity. The text declaration MUST NOT appear at any position other than the beginning of an external parsed entity. The text declaration in an external parsed entity is not considered part of its replacement text. 4.3.2 Well-Formed Parsed EntitiesThe document entity is well-formed if it matches the production labeled document. An external general parsed entity is well-formed if it matches the production labeled extParsedEnt. All external parameter entities are well-formed by definition. Note: Only parsed entities that are referenced directly or indirectly within the document are required to be well-formed. Well-Formed External Parsed Entity
An internal general parsed entity is well-formed if its replacement text matches the production labeled content. All internal parameter entities are well-formed by definition. A consequence of well-formedness in general entities is that the logical and physical structures in an XML document are properly nested; no start-tag, end-tag, empty-element tag, element, comment, processing instruction, character reference, or entity reference can begin in one entity and end in another. 4.3.3 Character Encoding in EntitiesEach external parsed entity in an XML document may use a different encoding for its characters. All XML processors MUST be able to read entities in both the UTF-8 and UTF-16 encodings. The terms "UTF-8" and "UTF-16" in this specification do not apply to character encodings with any other labels, even if the encodings or labels are very similar to UTF-8 or UTF-16. Entities encoded in UTF-16 MUST and entities encoded in UTF-8 MAY begin with the Byte Order Mark described by Annex H of [ISO/IEC 10646:2000], section 2.4 of [Unicode], and section 2.7 of [Unicode3] (the ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE character, #xFEFF). This is an encoding signature, not part of either the markup or the character data of the XML document. XML processors MUST be able to use this character to differentiate between UTF-8 and UTF-16 encoded documents. Although an XML processor is required to read only entities in the UTF-8 and UTF-16 encodings, it is recognized that other encodings are used around the world, and it may be desired for XML processors to read entities that use them. In the absence of external character encoding information (such as MIME headers), parsed entities which are stored in an encoding other than UTF-8 or UTF-16 MUST begin with a text declaration (see 4.3.1 The Text Declaration) containing an encoding declaration: Encoding Declaration
In the document entity, the encoding declaration is part of the XML declaration. The EncName is the name of the encoding used. In an encoding declaration, the values " In the absence of information provided by an external transport protocol (e.g. HTTP or MIME), it is a fatal error for an entity including an encoding declaration to be presented to the XML processor in an encoding other than that named in the declaration, or for an entity which begins with neither a Byte Order Mark nor an encoding declaration to use an encoding other than UTF-8. Note that since ASCII is a subset of UTF-8, ordinary ASCII entities do not strictly need an encoding declaration. It is a fatal error for a TextDecl to occur other than at the beginning of an external entity. It is a fatal error when an XML processor encounters an entity with an encoding that it is unable to process. It is a fatal error if an XML entity is determined (via default, encoding declaration, or higher-level protocol) to be in a certain encoding but contains byte sequences that are not legal in that encoding. Specifically, it is a fatal error if an entity encoded in UTF-8 contains any irregular code unit sequences, as defined in Unicode 3.1 [Unicode3]. Unless an encoding is determined by a higher-level protocol, it is also a fatal error if an XML entity contains no encoding declaration and its content is not legal UTF-8 or UTF-16. Examples of text declarations containing encoding declarations: 4.4 XML Processor Treatment of Entities and ReferencesThe table below summarizes the contexts in which character references, entity references, and invocations of unparsed entities might appear and the REQUIRED behavior of an XML processor in each case. The labels in the leftmost column describe the recognition context:
4.4.1 Not RecognizedOutside the DTD, the 4.4.2 Included
[Definition: An entity is included
when its replacement text is retrieved
and processed, in place of the reference itself, as though it were part of
the document at the location the reference was recognized.] The replacement
text may contain both character data
and (except for parameter entities) markup,
which MUST be recognized in the usual way. (The string " 4.4.3 Included If ValidatingWhen an XML processor recognizes a reference to a parsed entity, in order to validate the document, the processor MUST include its replacement text. If the entity is external, and the processor is not attempting to validate the XML document, the processor MAY, but need not, include the entity's replacement text. If a non-validating processor does not include the replacement text, it MUST inform the application that it recognized, but did not read, the entity. This rule is based on the recognition that the automatic inclusion provided by the SGML and XML entity mechanism, primarily designed to support modularity in authoring, is not necessarily appropriate for other applications, in particular document browsing. Browsers, for example, when encountering an external parsed entity reference, might choose to provide a visual indication of the entity's presence and retrieve it for display only on demand. 4.4.4 ForbiddenThe following are forbidden, and constitute fatal errors:
4.4.5 Included in LiteralWhen an entity reference appears in an attribute value, or a parameter entity reference appears in a literal entity value, its replacement text MUST be processed in place of the reference itself as though it were part of the document at the location the reference was recognized, except that a single or double quote character in the replacement text MUST always be treated as a normal data character and MUST NOT terminate the literal. For example, this is well-formed: while this is not:
4.6 Predefined Entities
[Definition: Entity and character references may
both be used to escape the left angle bracket, ampersand, and
other delimiters. A set of general entities ( All XML processors MUST recognize these entities whether they are declared
or not. For interoperability, valid XML
documents SHOULD declare these entities, like any others, before using them. If
the entities 4.7 Notation Declarations[Definition: Notations identify by name the format of unparsed entities, the format of elements which bear a notation attribute, or the application to which a processing instruction is addressed.] [Definition: Notation declarations provide a name for the notation, for use in entity and attribute-list declarations and in attribute specifications, and an external identifier for the notation which may allow an XML processor or its client application to locate a helper application capable of processing data in the given notation.] Notation Declarations
Validity constraint: Unique Notation Name A given Name MUST NOT be declared in more than one notation declaration. XML processors MUST provide applications with the name and external identifier(s) of any notation declared and referred to in an attribute value, attribute definition, or entity declaration. They MAY additionally resolve the external identifier into the system identifier, file name, or other information needed to allow the application to call a processor for data in the notation described. (It is not an error, however, for XML documents to declare and refer to notations for which notation-specific applications are not available on the system where the XML processor or application is running.) 4.8 Document Entity[Definition: The document entity serves as the root of the entity tree and a starting-point for an XML processor.] This specification does not specify how the document entity is to be located by an XML processor; unlike other entities, the document entity has no name and might well appear on a processor input stream without any identification at all. 5 Conformance5.1 Validating and Non-Validating ProcessorsConforming XML processors fall into two classes: validating and non-validating. Validating and non-validating processors alike MUST report violations of this specification's well-formedness constraints in the content of the document entity and any other parsed entities that they read. [Definition: Validating processors MUST, at user option, report violations of the constraints expressed by the declarations in the DTD, and failures to fulfill the validity constraints given in this specification.] To accomplish this, validating XML processors MUST read and process the entire DTD and all external parsed entities referenced in the document. Non-validating processors are REQUIRED to check only the document
entity, including the entire internal DTD subset, for well-formedness. [Definition: While they are not required
to check the document for validity, they are REQUIRED to process
all the declarations they read in the internal DTD subset and in any parameter
entity that they read, up to the first reference to a parameter entity that
they do not read; that is to say, they MUST use the information
in those declarations to normalize
attribute values, include the replacement
text of internal entities, and supply default
attribute values.] Except when Note that when processing invalid documents with a non-validating processor the application may not be presented with consistent information. For example, several requirements for uniqueness within the document may not be met, including more than one element with the same id, duplicate declarations of elements or notations with the same name, etc. In these cases the behavior of the parser with respect to reporting such information to the application is undefined. 5.2 Using XML ProcessorsThe behavior of a validating XML processor is highly predictable; it must read every piece of a document and report all well-formedness and validity violations. Less is required of a non-validating processor; it need not read any part of the document other than the document entity. This has two effects that may be important to users of XML processors:
For maximum reliability in interoperating between different XML processors, applications which use non-validating processors SHOULD NOT rely on any behaviors not required of such processors. Applications which require DTD facilities not related to validation (such as the declaration of default attributes and internal entities that are or may be specified in external entities) SHOULD use validating XML processors. 6 NotationThe formal grammar of XML is given in this specification using a simple Extended Backus-Naur Form (EBNF) notation. Each rule in the grammar defines one symbol, in the form symbol ::= expression Symbols are written with an initial capital letter if they are the start symbol of a regular language, otherwise with an initial lowercase letter. Literal strings are quoted. Within the expression on the right-hand side of a rule, the following expressions are used to match strings of one or more characters:
These symbols may be combined to match more complex patterns as follows,
where
Other notations used in the productions are:
A ReferencesA.1 Normative References
A.2 Other References
B Character ClassesFollowing the characteristics defined in the Unicode standard, characters are classed as base characters (among others, these contain the alphabetic characters of the Latin alphabet), ideographic characters, and combining characters (among others, this class contains most diacritics). Digits and extenders are also distinguished. Characters
The character classes defined here can be derived from the Unicode 2.0 character database as follows:
C XML and SGML (Non-Normative)XML is designed to be a subset of SGML, in that every XML document should also be a conforming SGML document. For a detailed comparison of the additional restrictions that XML places on documents beyond those of SGML, see [Clark]. D Expansion of Entity and Character References (Non-Normative)This appendix contains some examples illustrating the sequence of entity- and character-reference recognition and expansion, as specified in 4.4 XML Processor Treatment of Entities and References. If the DTD contains the declaration An ampersand (&) may be escaped numerically (&#38;) or with a general entity (&)." > then the XML processor will recognize the character references when it
parses the entity declaration, and resolve them before storing the following
string as the value of the entity "
A reference in the document to " An ampersand (&) may be escaped numerically (&) or with a general entity (&). A more complex example will illustrate the rules and their effects fully. In the following example, the line numbers are solely for reference. 1 2 4 5 ' > 6 %xx; 7 ]> 8 This produces the following:
E Deterministic Content Models (Non-Normative)As noted in 3.2.1 Element Content, it is required that content models in element type declarations be deterministic. This requirement is for compatibility with SGML (which calls deterministic content models "unambiguous"); XML processors built using SGML systems may flag non-deterministic content models as errors. For example, the content model More formally: a finite state automaton may be constructed from the content model using the standard algorithms, e.g. algorithm 3.5 in section 3.9 of Aho, Sethi, and Ullman [Aho/Ullman]. In many such algorithms, a follow set is constructed for each position in the regular expression (i.e., each leaf node in the syntax tree for the regular expression); if any position has a follow set in which more than one following position is labeled with the same element type name, then the content model is in error and may be reported as an error. Algorithms exist which allow many but not all non-deterministic content models to be reduced automatically to equivalent deterministic models; see Brüggemann-Klein 1991 [Brüggemann-Klein]. F Autodetection of Character Encodings (Non-Normative)The XML encoding declaration functions as an internal label on each entity, indicating which character encoding is in use. Before an XML processor can read the internal label, however, it apparently has to know what character encoding is in use—which is what the internal label is trying to indicate. In the general case, this is a hopeless situation. It is not entirely hopeless in XML, however, because XML limits the general case in two ways: each implementation is assumed to support only a finite set of character encodings, and the XML encoding declaration is restricted in position and content in order to make it feasible to autodetect the character encoding in use in each entity in normal cases. Also, in many cases other sources of information are available in addition to the XML data stream itself. Two cases may be distinguished, depending on whether the XML entity is presented to the processor without, or with, any accompanying (external) information. We consider the first case first. F.1 Detection Without External Encoding InformationBecause each XML entity not accompanied by external
encoding information and not in UTF-8 or UTF-16 encoding must
begin with an XML encoding declaration, in which the first characters must
be ' With a Byte Order Mark:
Without a Byte Order Mark:
Note: In cases above which do not require reading the encoding declaration to determine the encoding, section 4.3.3 still requires that the encoding declaration, if present, be read and that the encoding name be checked to match the actual encoding of the entity. Also, it is possible that new character encodings will be invented that will make it necessary to use the encoding declaration to determine the encoding, in cases where this is not required at present. This level of autodetection is enough to read the XML encoding declaration and parse the character-encoding identifier, which is still necessary to distinguish the individual members of each family of encodings (e.g. to tell UTF-8 from 8859, and the parts of 8859 from each other, or to distinguish the specific EBCDIC code page in use, and so on). Because the contents of the encoding declaration are restricted to characters from the ASCII repertoire (however encoded), a processor can reliably read the entire encoding declaration as soon as it has detected which family of encodings is in use. Since in practice, all widely used character encodings fall into one of the categories above, the XML encoding declaration allows reasonably reliable in-band labeling of character encodings, even when external sources of information at the operating-system or transport-protocol level are unreliable. Character encodings such as UTF-7 that make overloaded usage of ASCII-valued bytes may fail to be reliably detected. Once the processor has detected the character encoding in use, it can act appropriately, whether by invoking a separate input routine for each case, or by calling the proper conversion function on each character of input. Like any self-labeling system, the XML encoding declaration will not work if any software changes the entity's character set or encoding without updating the encoding declaration. Implementors of character-encoding routines should be careful to ensure the accuracy of the internal and external information used to label the entity. F.2 Priorities in the Presence of External Encoding InformationThe second possible case occurs when the XML entity is accompanied by encoding
information, as in some file systems and some network protocols. When multiple
sources of information are available, their relative priority and the preferred
method of handling conflict should be specified as part of the higher-level
protocol used to deliver XML. In particular, please refer
to [IETF RFC 3023] or its successor, which defines the
G W3C XML Working Group (Non-Normative)This specification was prepared and approved for publication by the W3C XML Working Group (WG). WG approval of this specification does not necessarily imply that all WG members voted for its approval. The current and former participants of the XML WG are:
H W3C XML Core Working Group (Non-Normative)The fourth edition of this specification was prepared by the W3C XML Core Working Group (WG). The participants in the WG at the time of publication of this edition were:
I Production Notes (Non-Normative)This Fourth Edition was encoded in a slightly modified version of the XMLspec DTD, v2.10. The XHTML versions were produced with a combination of the xmlspec.xsl, diffspec.xsl, and REC-xml.xsl XSLT stylesheets. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Altova | Rechtsabteilung | Presse | Partner | Karriere | Übersicht | Kontakt | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
