|
|
Rank: Newbie
Joined: 11/3/2013
Posts: 8
Location: home
|
Hi,
I have XSLT(3) that produces PDF from XML. Running environment is UbuntuServer+FlowForceServer+StyleVisionServer.
Server is running 4core and 8Mb.
XSLT is complex and does time consuming complex math operations. Some case fe. 1Mb XML = 10hour PDF generation.
I know there must be several functions etc. to develop better xslt-code.
Can anyone say if it is better to try it with RaptorXML ?
Could it optimise processing xslt just as-it-is ?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 12/13/2005
Posts: 2,856
Location: Mauritius
|
StyleVision Server is easier to use for jobs produced by StyleVision. I would stick to it, because it uses internally RaptorXML, so no performance difference to be expected. Also, StyleVisionServer automatically involves Apache FOP processing as a second stage to produce PDF, which you will have to do manually if you switch to RaptorXML Server. By the way, most probably FOP is the one who needs most of the time.
|
|
Rank: Newbie
Joined: 11/3/2013
Posts: 8
Location: home
|
Thabk you for a fast reply.
I have never thought that problem could be fop.
Are there really options if pdf generation is highly automated by FF job ?
|
|
|
guest |
