John Snelson schrieb:
> Michael Ludwig wrote:
>> Is a "dynamic error" just another word for "runtime error"?
>
> Mostly - but if the implementation can prove that a dynamic error is
> always raised during evaluation, it is free to raise it at compile
> time.
>
>> Is a "static error" then the same as a "compile-time error"?
>
> A static error is certainly raised during compilation - but it's not
> the only type of error that can be.
>
> There's also type errors, which can be raised at compile-time or
> runtime regardless of whether you can prove they will always be raised
> during execution.

Thanks, this makes it clear enough for me.

Also, I should have known where to look up these definitions.

http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#errors

Michael Ludwig

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe@l...>
--~--