>Archive Index
>xsl-list Archive Home
>Recent entries

>Thread Prev - RE: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "can you sell an XSLT?"
>Thread Next - RE: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "can you sell an XSLT?"

Re: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "can you sell an XSLT?"

From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@-----.--->
To: xsl-list@-----.------------.---
Date: 6/5/2009 2:08:00 PM

> We haven't done any serious work on this yet, but it's tentatively on the
> agenda. Not so much an archive format as such, but rather, language changes
> to make separate compilation of modules a realistic proposition. At the
> moment it's a non-starter, because almost anything you assume to be true
> when you compile a library module can be overridden when you import it from
> a new top-level module.

I was going to say to make things "final" you could restrict it to
xsl:include only....  Or introduce a final attribute.

Personally I would be quite happy if it were limited to include only.



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe@l...>
--~--

>Thread Prev - RE: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "can you sell an XSLT?"
>Thread Next - RE: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "can you sell an XSLT?"

>Archive Index
>xsl-list Archive Home
>Recent entries

Altova Mailing List Archives

Re: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "can you sell an XSLT?"