Altova Mailing List Archives

RE: [xsl] xmlns created literally

From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@--------->
Date: 2/26/2009 5:12:00 PM
Owen Rees wrote:
> It seems to me that this ends up meaning that an XML namespace is
> identified by a string.

This is precisely what made a lot of people cranky when namespaces were
first rushed to standardization.  They look and smell like URIs, but they
are not.  There is no guarantee that they are dereferenceable nor that
anything useful will be there if they are.

The choice to use URIs was as a way of namespace allocation; if I publish
a schema with a URI at, I can reasonably expect Sun Microsystems
to, at some point, get around to suing me for trademark infringement at
the least.

This was inspired in part by the Java class naming convention; I was never
clear on why pseudo-URIs won the day over a different syntax. 
Familiarity, I suppose.

All that said, it is done now.  Users should just be *very aware* that
namespace so-called URIs are merely magic strings, to be used with



These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.