 |
|
|
> Since you require XSLT 2.0 it would be more precise to use
> regular expression for stuff like this, like
>
> //@*[matches(., 'true[^(] | false[^(]', 'x')]
>
> (I like the x flag, which allows white-space for readability.)
yes, so long as you get the regexes right! This example only matches "true"
if it is followed by a character other than "(" - it fails to match
select="true" on its own.
To be honest, I think a production-quality tool that attempts this kind of
analysis should parse the XPath expressions properly.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
|
|
| |
These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.
| |
| |
|
|
|
