Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xsl-list Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: [xsl] xslt 1.0 vs xslt 2.0 problem [Thread Next] Re: [xsl] xslt 1.0 vs xslt 2.0 problemTo: Date: 9/3/2008 6:20:00 PM I did understand you mean the first node, not the first attribute. Comprehension check: Does this at all contradict what Darcy wrote? I don't think it does...but just making sure. --- On Wed, 9/3/08, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt 1.0 vs xslt 2.0 problem To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 11:17 AM I wrote: > //A[contains((B/@a[1]), 'foo')] but meant: //A[contains((B/@a)[1], 'foo')] ...but hopefully you got the idea! -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/ | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
