Altova Mailing List Archives

Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT

From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@----------->
Date: 6/27/2008 1:54:00 PM
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:26 PM
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT

I guess that we all agree that the new LINQ to XML API is the
greatest thing to happen to XML for a very long time.

No, proprietary languages are bad, however good they are.

And procedural languages will always be worse than declarative languages 

a very large class of problems.

Perhaps I'm not being fair, there are millions of programmers out there

churning out zillions of lines of inefficient and unmaintanable DOM code,

and anything that improves their lives is to be welcomed. But they already

have the opportunity to do that, and to adopt approaches that are both 

more powerful and less proprietary.

Michael Kay

True but in LINQ's defence it is declarative, in the same mould as SQL.



These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.