Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xsl-list Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: [xsl] Namespaces conventions: Why ALWAYS "http:..." tags ? [Thread Next] RE: [xsl] Namespaces conventions: Why ALWAYS "http:..." tags ?To: Date: 2/1/2007 12:50:00 PM > Much more can be said about pros/cons and naming. I > personally, after getting used to it, have found it rather > convenient to use http URLs and it saved me many headaches of > having to think of yet another naming convention. I resisted "http" in namespaces for a long time because the "p" stands for "protocol" and this gives the misleading impression that some network communication is involved. But I know when I've lost a fight, and I now go along with the flow. It's stupid, but you get used to it. Historically, there has always been a camp that believed that namespace URIs should in fact identify a resource, for example a RDDL document. In fact, namespaces allocated by W3C do (by convention) always identify a document that gives you a description of the namespace and a pointer to its specification. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
