 |
 |
 |
hello.
- about the element() scheme being required:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude/#xml-included-items
section 4.2: [...]
third-last paragraph: "XPointers of the forms described in [XPointer
Framework] and [XPointer element() scheme] must be supported."
- about the problem testing ft-include2.xsl (by which i think you mean
ft-include2.x*m*l):
this works for me, resulting in ultimately including include1.xml. i am
using saxonsa-8.8j. what are you using? i found that all xslt 2.0
implementations other than saxon which i have tried so far are highly
unsatisfactory in terms of implementation quality (and i am not
affiliated with saxonica in any way).
if possible, please cc be on mails to the list, because i am not
subscribed to receive all posts individually.
thanks for your feedback and kind regards,
erik wilde tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814
dret@xxxxxxxxxxxx - http://dret.net/netdret
UC Berkeley - School of Information (iSchool)
|
 | 

|  |
These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.
|  |
| |
 |
 |
 |