Altova Mailing List Archives

Re: [xsl] What is a better word for "de-duplication"?

From: Jim Melton <jim.melton@------->
Date: 8/28/2006 2:57:00 AM
In the SQL world, we simply say "duplicate elimination".  I know 
that's not "a single short word", but it is complete and 
unambiguous.  Of course, you could always coin a word and try to sell 
it to the community at large :^)  How about "uniquify"?  I'll donate 
that one license free.


At 8/27/2006 07:14 PM, Jay Bryant wrote:
That's a tough one.


None of those quite fits, though.

English has a number of nouns for the basic concept, including "unique" and
"distinct". However, I can't think of (or find online) a verb for that

FWIW (not much, I suspect)

Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 7:41 PM
Subject: [xsl] What is a better word for "de-duplication"?

> I want to use a single, short word to express the act of removing
> duplicates from a node-set. I remember seing the word "de-duplication"
> used, however it sounds ugly.
> Could someone suggest a better word, please?
> --
> Cheers,
> Dimitre Novatchev
> ---------------------------------------
> Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
> ---------------------------------------
> To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk


Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL)     Phone: +1.801.942.0144

  Co-Chair, W3C XML Query WG; F&O (etc.) editor    Fax : +1.801.942.3345

Oracle Corporation        Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com

1930 Viscounti Drive      Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org

Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA          Personal email: jim at melton dot name


=  Facts are facts.   But any opinions expressed are the opinions      =

=  only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody   =

=  else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand.  =



These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.