 |
 |
 |
Sorry, my mistake - you need to construct a new document that is
amenable to processing.
There are a number of ways of doing this, e.g. by creating a result-tree
- not strictly standard, I know but it illustrates the method:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:ms="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xslt">
....
<xsl:variable name="g">
<xsl:for-each select="*">
<group name="{local-name()}" />
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:variable>
<xsl:apply-templates select="ms:node-set($g)/group">
<xsl:sort select="@name" />
</xsl:apply-templates>
<xsl:template match="group[(@name = preceding-sibling::group/@name)]"
priority="+1" />
<xsl:template match="group">
<group name="{@name}" />
</xsl:template>
.....
Alternatives:
1. use a multi-stage pipeline such as Apache Cocoon
2. nested translation in JSP
3. change the input format if you can
Michael Kay wrote:
These seem to be solutions to a different problem. The original XML has no
@name attributes.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Franz [mailto:afranz0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 01 August 2005 22:11
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [xsl] Grouping problem
Mukul Gandhi wrote:
Thanks Mike for the XSLT 2.0 way to solve the problem. But it was
surprising for me that the problem cannot be solved in XSLT 1.0 using
preceding-sibling axis.
Regards,
Mukul
Solution #1:
<xsl:template match="groups">
<xsl:for-each select="group">
<xsl:sort select="@name" />
<xsl:if test="not(@name = preceding-sibling::group/@name)">
<group name="{@name}" />
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
Solution #2:
<xsl:template match="groups">
<xsl:for-each select="group">
<xsl:sort select="@name" />
<xsl:apply-templates select="." />
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="group[(@name = preceding-sibling::group/@name)]"
priority="+1" />
<xsl:template match="group">
<group name="{@name}" />
</xsl:template>
Solution #3:
<xsl:key name="k2" match="group" use="@name" />
<xsl:template match="groups">
<xsl:for-each select="group">
<xsl:sort select="@name" />
<xsl:apply-templates select="." />
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="group" priority="-1" />
<xsl:template match="group[generate-id() = generate-id(key('k2',
@name)[1])]">
group[<xsl:value-of select="@id" />]=<xsl:value-of select="@name"
/><br/>
</xsl:template>
On 8/1/05, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When comparing two node-sets,
X = Y
means "some $x in X equals some $y in Y"
But when you do
name(X) = name(Y)
you are comparing two strings, not two node-sets. If X is a
node-set, then
name(X) is the name of the first node in X, and name(Y) is
the name of the
first node in Y. (In XSLT 2.0, with version="2.0", you
would get an error
trying to apply name() to a node-set containing more than
one node. The
change has been made to catch this common mistake.)
In 2.0 you can write
select="*[not(name() = preceding-sibling::*/name())]"
but of course it would be more efficient to use xsl:for-each-group.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Mukul Gandhi [mailto:gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 01 August 2005 07:57
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [xsl] Grouping problem
I have the following XML file -
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<root>
<a>1</a>
<b>2</b>
<d>3</d>
<d>4</d>
<b>5</b>
<b>6</b>
<c>7</c>
<c>8</c>
<a>9</a>
</root>
I am trying to do grouping operation with the following XSL -
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"
indent="yes"/>
<xsl:template match="/root">
<groups>
<xsl:for-each select="*[not(name() =
name(preceding-sibling::*))]">
<group name="{name()}" />
</xsl:for-each>
</groups>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
I am expecting output -
<groups>
<group name="a" />
<group name="b" />
<group name="c" />
<group name="d" />
</groups>
But I get output -
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<groups>
<group name="a"/>
<group name="b"/>
<group name="d"/>
<group name="d"/>
<group name="b"/>
<group name="b"/>
<group name="c"/>
<group name="c"/>
</groups>
Where is the problem?
This is tested with Xalan-J 2.6.0 and Saxon 8.4
Regards,
Mukul
|
 | 

|  |
These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.
|  |
| |
 |
 |
 |