I'm not really sure where this question/comment ought to go, but since 
it came in the midst of working with XSTL 2, this seems a good place.



The data-typing-related support in XSLT 2 is based on XML Schema.  So, 
in both cases, a "date" is defined as YYYY-MM-DD, and anything else is 
invalid.  While this makes sense when you consider YYYY/MM/DD, 
MM-DD-YYYY and so forth, why can't all of the following be valid dates?



YYYY-MM-DD
YYYY-MM
YYYY

This comes out of working with bibliographic data, where one typically 
has issue dates of year-only, sometimes year-and-month, and only 
occasionally the full "date" as understood by xs:date.



This means I have to define my own schema patterns if I write a schema, 
and my own equivalents to handle the stuff in XSLT 2 if I don't want to 
select the substrings.



Does nobody else find this a problem?  Is there any prospect to change 
it?



I'm just having a hard time understanding how I can code a schema to 
enforce dates of the sort I deal with and also get the advantage of the 
datatyping and XSLT 2 date formatting.



If I do:



<date year="1999" month="03"/>



... that's easy to control and flexible, but there's no format-month 
function (in Saxon 8 at least).



Bruce