![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xsl-list Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not? >Thread Next - Re: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not? RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?To: Date: 7/1/2002 6:31:00 AM > We have been trying to determine whether using XSL:For-Each > is having an impact on the speed of our document publishing. > Some of my buddies don't want to use xsl:for-each because > they believe it causes the process to take a longer amount of > time than just doing a template match over and over. Is this > true or no? Is xsl:for-each a performance hog or does it and > template matching take the same amount of time? > Measure it and see. The results will depend on which XSLT processor you are using. My guess is that there will be very little difference. The arguments against xsl:for-each are based on maintainability, not on performance. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | |||
|
