![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xsl-list Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not? >Thread Next - RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not? RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?To: Date: 7/1/2002 1:50:00 PM Mike, At 03:11 PM 7/1/2002, you wrote: It's not that difficult. Saxon doesn't quite achieve this today but it will in the next release (I just tested it). X[position() = 1 and name()='factorof'] can be statically rewritten as X[1][name()='factorof'] That's cool! Will it do the same for X[name()='factorof' and position()=1] ? Cheers, Wendell ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ====================================================================== XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | |||
|
