Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xsl-list Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not? [Thread Next] RE: [xsl] XSL: For-Each Efficient or Not?To: Date: 7/2/2002 12:11:00 AM > > Will it do the same for X[name()='factorof' and position()=1] ? > I'm still thinking about that. XPath 1.0 doesn't allow the processor to re-order the branches of an "and" expression (the behavior in error cases might be different); but XPath 2.0 does allow it. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
