and thats because EDI represents ( at least to me ) the antithesis of what
xml is as a pure file format, though i can use & in EDI without any
*grumble*<![CDATA[]]> *grumble*................

cheers, jim fuller


----- Original Message -----
From: "Clapham, Paul" <pclapham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 6:14 PM
Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt and edi question


> I can't speak for Allen, and I know this is off-topic for XSLT, but in my
> experience with EDI the short answer is "Damn right they expect us to do
> that translation."
>
> PC2
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Draucker [mailto:richard@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: August 1, 2001 10:03
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt and edi question
>
>
> I thought the whole value in XML for EDI was the deployment of a
schema/dtd
> to which each client would adhere.  Are you saying the clients expect you
to
>
> do the translation from their inhouse format to your XML schema/dtd for
> them?
>  Just curious.
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list