Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: Apache Module (Xalan?) - XSLT performance study?

From: "Paulo Gaspar" <Paulo.Gaspar@------------>
To:
Date: 6/2/2000 2:19:00 PM
That is completely different:
 -A round trip trough a HTTP server can amount to nearly nothing if the
  server is not very busy and the network connection is fast;
- But a database connection depends A LOT on the operation and on the
  database itself.

A database parentesis:
(
  Example on database dependency: I benchmarked in Oracle8 vs. MS SQL
  Server 7 databases 2 simple queries. One returned a very small dataset
  and the other a very large one.

  There was not much difference in times for the large one but there was
  always a larger latency for the small one. I had the MS SQL Server 7
  in the local machine and the Oracle 8 server in another PC in the
  network but I was getting a 0 ms time for Oracle (mening that the time
  was so small that I could not measure it) and 30 ms for SQL Server.
  And yes, I had TCP/IP in SQL Server, not named pipes (which are slower).

  I admit that my tests were not very scientific but these times were
  very consistent across several repetitions.
)


I suggest we agree on some specific benchmark we can perform in both
parsers. I have an eye on Xalan and I am interested to move to Java
as soon as I can. So, I am interested also on Java parser timmings.

I will help as I can performing such a benchmark. I thing my
experience with MSXML is already good enough for me to be of some use.

We should obviously let databases and HTTP roundtrips out of the
equation.

I would like to have suggestions on how this can be accomplished, or
just some data if someone already did it.
=:o)


Thanks and have fun,

Paulo


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jon Smirl
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 4:08 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Apache Module (Xalan?)


To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> MSXML3 sure is much faster than that!!!

Have you benchmarked MSXML3 versus the C version of Xalan? My times are for
a complete round trip though an HTTP server including the page transform.
XSL is just part of the equation, there's a SQL server involved too. I'm
also still undecided about the impact of having three processes (Apache, app
server (JServ/XT/XP), dbengine) vs a single process scheme.

Has anyone done any pure benchmarks of just a cached XSLT transform on
MSXML3 vs Xalan?

Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxxxxx



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


transparent
Print
Mail
Digg
delicious
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent