Altova Mailing List Archives
>xsl-list Archive Home
>Recent entries
>Thread Prev -
>Thread Next - Re: More XSL Discussion
Re: More XSL Discussion
To:
Date: 2/26/1998 6:25:00 AM
>You've got a tool that does the report generation you need. Why does >that language have to be a "standard" for it to be useful? Of course it doesn't need to be standardized in order to be useful. However, using a standardized language makes it less of an issue if I go under a bus and someone else has to pick up my stuff and run with it. We do a lot of work with data-entry bureaus. I would love to be able to send those guys QA scripts as well as stylesheets. It would make my life a lot easier if I could just say "it is in XSL. Get yourself an XSL processor". Rather than fight with installations of perl, python or whatever. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Disclaimer
These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

