Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


Comment of section 2.2

From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@---------.--->
To: <xmlschema-dev@--.--->
Date: 7/27/2009 3:04:00 PM
In XSD 1.1 section 2.2 it says:

Note: At the abstract level, there is no requirement that the components of 
a schema share a ·target namespace·. Any schema for use in ·assessment· of 
documents containing names from more than one namespace will of necessity 
include components with different ·target namespaces·. This contrasts with 
the situation at the level of the XML representation of components, in which 
each schema document contributes definitions and declarations to a single 
target namespace.

Is the last sentence still true anymore?

Thanks,

Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using XML C++
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info





transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent