Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - >Thread Next - RE: Motivations for restricting the "all" group Motivations for restricting the "all" groupTo: xmlschema-dev@--.--- Date: 5/28/2009 6:55:00 AM I have been trying to do some research into regular expressions and the "all" group used in XML Schema, as mentioned in http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-0-20010502/ It is clear that "all" is in some sense restricted, since it can only combine elements, and must appear at top level. My question is, what was the original inspiration for "all", what is the "unrestricted" form of "all", and why was it originally restricted, in the design of XML Schema? Some academic authors claim that "all" is a restricted form of "interleaving", a known operator in regular language theory, for which the membership problem is NP-complete. But this is not clear to me, as interleaving means that the words are shuffled in a way that does not seem to make sense for natural languages. I believe that the "&" from SGML is a more natural extensions, but I cannot find any reference to the original motivation, or to the reasons for limiting "all". Thank you for any help, Dag Hovland | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
