> > I think the working group felt that
> > introducing context-dependent validation (where the validity of a 
> > document depends on factors other than the schema and the instance 
> > document) was a risky architectural innovation, and possibly a step 
> > that would be later regretted.
> 
> So they actually had no reason? Just some vague possibility. 

Actually, now I recall some of the discussion: one of the concerns was
specifically the subject of this original question. Should the referenced
document be schema-validated? If so, how do you prevent circularities, or
infinite regress? Some members of the WG feel strongly that validation
should never pose any denial-of-service risks, and allowing doc() opens up
all sorts of possibilities.

Potential problems like this can consume an immense amount of WG time, and
when a spec is running years late already, there is a strong temptation for
the chair to encourage people to cut a feature rather than spend time
discussing whether or not it creates a problem.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/


From Paul.Steckler@n... Sun May 03 02:06:30 2009
Received