info-1588 wrote:
> 
> 
> but, if I do understand it well, this means that you have two different 
> (versions of the) schemas, with the same namespace, and different
> (although 
> slightly different) content.
> 
> This is something, just from a principal point of view, I do not like.
> My principle is "new standard (version) => new schema (version) => new 
> namespace".
> 
> 
Point taken and I even was aware of it, but lost in namespace, so to say.
Will 
think it over.


info-1588 wrote:
> 
> In your case, I would definitely opt for writing a schematron (which is a 
> good excercise anyway).  ;-)
> 
I am no longer sure if that is a good idea. Michael Kay already mentioned
that in my case I do not want to validate data, but schemas. I want
different schemas for hospital admins and researchers, so that some stacked
series of schemas would be able to qualify the file as public, research,
hospital.

Dieter


-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Conditional-Levels-of-a-Schema-tp22905179p22930935.html
Sent from the w3.org - xmlschema-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


From mike@s... Tue Apr 07 15:09:39 2009
Received: from maggie.w3.or