Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: Differences in derivation by extension of complex types between Schema 1.0 and 1.1 [Thread Next] Re: Differences in derivation by extension of complex types between Schema 1.0 and 1.1To: xmlschema-dev@--.--- Date: 2/19/2009 7:01:00 PM On Thursday 19 February 2009 17:40:00 Kevin Braun wrote: > Hi Tobias, Hej Kevin, > You are right, it wouldn't make sense for the derived type to have empty > content. However, I think that the result is that it makes the derived > type an invalid extension, according to 3.4.6.2, and I suspect that is > the purpose. Right, so as that schema comes from the schema-test-suite and is marked as valid there, I'll submit a bug report against it. Thank you very much for brainstorming! :) Ciao, Tobias From mike@s... Thu Feb 19 18:12:53 2009 Received: f | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
