Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - RE: restriction against base type (choice - elt) [Thread Next] Re: restriction against base type (choice - elt)To: Bharath Kumar Reddy T <bharathkr@------.---> Date: 1/28/2009 11:01:00 AM
Hi,
If you take your initial sample and remove the substitution group you
will get exactly to that situation:
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xs:element name="head"/>
<xs:element name="m1"/>
<xs:element name="m2"/>
<xs:complexType name="base">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element ref="head"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="derived">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:restriction base="base">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:choice>
<xs:element ref="m1"/>
<xs:element ref="m2"/>
</xs:choice>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>
Best Regards,
George
--
George Cristian Bina
<oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger
www.---.com
Bharath Kumar Reddy T wrote:
>
>
> Hi..
>
> In the table which is in the link
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#cos-particle-restrict it is given tha=
t
> the case
>
> Choice(derived) and elt(base) is forbidden.
>
> Can you please tell me the meaning of this??
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Bharath.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Cristian Bina [mailto:george@o...]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:35 PM
> To: Bharath Kumar Reddy T
> Cc: xmlschema-dev@w...; ashutosh_p@h...; ranjit@h...
> Subject: Re: restriction against base type (choice - elt)
>
> Hi Bharath,
>
> It looks valid to me because the head from the base is treated as a
> choice of head, m1 and m2, see
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#cos-particle-restrict
>
> 2.1 Any top-level element declaration particle (in R or B) which is the=
> {substitution group affiliation} of one or more other element
> declarations and whose =B7substitution group=B7 contains at least one
> element declaration other than itself is treated as if it were a choice=
> group whose {min occurs} and {max occurs} are those of the particle, an=
d
> whose {particles} consists of one particle with {min occurs} and {max
> occurs} of 1 for each of the declarations in its =B7substitution group=B7=
.
>
> Best Regards,
> George
> --
> George Cristian Bina
> <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger
> www.---.com
>
> Bharath Kumar Reddy T wrote:
> > Hi..
> >
> > According to specification the following schema is invalid since
> > according to the table in
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#cos-particle-restrict
> > it is given that the case "choice (Derived particle) to element(Base
> > Particle) is Forbidden"
> >
> >
> >
> > <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
> >
> > <xs:element name="head"/>
> > <xs:element name="m1" substitutionGroup="head"/> <xs:element nam=
e="m2"
> > substitutionGroup="head"/>
> >
> > <xs:complexType name="base">
> > <xs:sequence>
> > <xs:element ref="head"/>
> > </xs:sequence>
> > </xs:complexType>
> >
> > <xs:complexType name="derived">
> > <xs:complexContent>
> > <xs:restriction base="base">
> > <xs:sequence>
> > <xs:choice>
> > <xs:element ref="m1"/>
> > <xs:element ref="m2"/>
> > </xs:choice>
> > </xs:sequence>
> > </xs:restriction>
> > </xs:complexContent>
> > </xs:complexType>
> >
> > </xs:schema>
> >
> > Can anybody please tell me whether the above schema is valid or
> > invalid against the schema spec.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > Bharath.
> >
>
From bharathkr@h... Thu Jan 29 11:04:25 2009
Received: from bart.w3.org ([128.30.52.63])
by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <bharathkr@h... | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
