On 26 Jan 2009, at 09:08 , Eduardo Oliveira wrote:

> ...
> Even, I have a problem because I can not limit the repeating size  
> because the elements are inside an unbounded size choice element,  
> isn=B4t it?

Correct.  XSD 1.1 may be helpful to you here (so make sure your vendors
know you would like to see it supported), because it will allow you to
express

>
> Another problem I had is using xs:all inside the xs:group cause an  
> error. Is it not possible?

No, all-groups complicate matters a great deal when they are allowed
inside of other group types.  It's not the occurrence of xsd:all inside
the model group definition that is forbidden, but the use of that
defined all-group inside a sequence.  So what you want may be more like
this:


  <xsd:group name="bcx">
   <xsd:choice>
    <xsd:element ref="my:b" />
    <xsd:element ref="my:c" />
    <xsd:element ref="my:x" />
   </xsd:choice>
  </xsd:group>

  <xsd:complexType name="oliveira">
   <xsd:sequence>
    <xsd:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
     <xsd:group ref="my:bcx"/>
    </xsd:choice>
    <xsd:element ref="my:a" />
    <xsd:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
     <xsd:element ref="my:a" />
     <xsd:group ref="my:bcx"/>
    </xsd:choice>
   </xsd:sequence>
  </xsd:complexType>

I hope this helps.


-- 
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, W3C XML Activity
http://www.w3.org/People/cmsmcq
http://cmsmcq.com/mib/
http://www.balisage.net/



From bharathkr@h... Tue Jan 27 05:34:38 2009
Received: from bart.w3.org ([128.30.52