Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: anyAttribute via attributeGroup refs problem [Thread Next] RE: anyAttribute via attributeGroup refs problemTo: "'Christian Roth'" <roth@-----------.-->, "'XML Schema Development List'" Date: 11/11/2008 1:08:00 PM > Thank you! Is the "surprising rule" you refer to the one under > > §3.4.2-"XML Representation Summary: complexType Element > Information Item"-"Complex Type Definition with simple > content Schema Component"-2.2.1 Yes. > > (don't know if there is a more concise way of referring to > that specific document location)? The structure has been improved in XSD 1.1 to make referencing much easier. > > Yes, I would have expected a union in the same way single > attribute definitions form a union, since my personal view up > to now on "anyAttribute" was that it's just a slightly more > generalized "attribute". Obviously, it's not, but treated > quite differently. Haven't thought on this long enough, but: > are there use cases for namespace intersections? I personally can't see any logic behind the current design, but it appears there are reasonable people who can. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
