Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Why do we have 'Schema Component Constraint: Element Declarations Consistent' [Thread Next] Re: Why do we have 'Schema Component Constraint: Element Declarations Consistent'To: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@---------.---> Date: 6/26/2008 8:01:00 PM
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
This isn't really an answer, but it's a different way of stating the
constraint, in terms of an invariant that it guarantees:
the signature of an EII or AII determines its type
where by 'signature' I mean the path from the root.
ht
=2D --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i...
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged sp=
am]
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIY9lvkjnJixAXWBoRAglOAJ9zQj3pO1G78VtLx/mOSK2vEka5tgCgg1bD
N3eAlMIrqLC2El1zymDXl1Q=
=n2Mq
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From alexandre.brillant@g... Mon Jun 30 13:05:20 2008
Received: from [ | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
