Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: UPA example >Thread Next - Re: UPA example Re: UPA exampleTo: "Michael Kay" <mike@--------.--->, <xmlschema-dev@--.---> Date: 6/26/2008 11:07:00 AM - Original Message From: "Michael Kay" >> Personally I think that, subject to occurrence constraints, >> the particle that is currently gobbling up input, should have >> priority (i.e. they're greedy). ... > > Then I suggest you make the suggestion as a comment on the last call spec > which has just been published. I'll do that then. In the mean time, if any one wants to share with me why they think the current XSD 1.1 rules are preferable I'd interested to hear it. Thanks, Pete Cordell Codalogic For XML C++ data binding visit http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/ From andrew.j.welch@g... Thu Jun 26 09:12:24 2008 Received: | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
