Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: Implementations/Non-Implementations of xs:redefine? >Thread Next - Re: elment and attribute have the same ref point Re: Implementations/Non-Implementations of xs:redefine?To: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@--------.---> Date: 1/9/2008 2:02:00 PM
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Eliot Kimber writes:
> Having thought it about just now, it seems clear that the redefine
> feature definitely precludes caching of modules-as-redefined used via
> xs:include (that is, modules in the same namespace or no-namespace)
> and might preclude caching). The best you could do is cache modules in
> their unmodified state and apply redefines dynamically as you process
> top-level schemas.
Right -- so my point would be, _this_ case at least is not a
corner-case wrt xs:redefine as such, but rather an issue for
namespace/schema/cache management in multiple-validation-session
contexts. Many/most of the relevant issues might arise without
redefine being involved at all, e.g. if I have two documents which
share a namespace but have xsi:schema-location hints pointing to
differing schemas (e.g. different versions) for that namespace.
ht
=2D --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i...
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged sp=
am]
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHhNPWkjnJixAXWBoRAmckAJ9qBNHxprgrqO/jl/uldBx9tdQ99gCeJGUk
bLOYqRaajzo3j8A6PDMhIxM=
=phfU
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From ekimber@r... Wed Jan 09 14:11:35 2008
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([1 | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
