Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: Expressing relations between types

From: "Michael Kay" <mike@--------.--->
To: "'Eric MALENFANT'" <Eric.Malenfant@---------------.--->, <xmlschema-dev@--.--->
Date: 12/1/2007 12:22:00 AM
> I am thus wondering if there is a better way to define 
> "related" types like this.
> For example, is there a way to express the definition of 
> EntryPredicate by saying something like "this is the same 
> thing than an Entry, replacing dateTime by dateTimeRange, 
> unsingedInt by unsignedIntRange"?

Not within the XML Schema language.

Sometimes when your application contains higher-level structures or patterns
like this, it can be appropriate to describe the high-level structure in
your own notation and then generate the XML Schema definitions from this
(typically using XSLT to do the transformation).

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/


From mrglavas@c... Sun Dec 02 04:04:33 2007
Received:


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent