Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: optional, but at least one required >Thread Next - developing schema for word 2007 Re: optional, but at least one requiredTo: noah_mendelsohn@--.---.--- Date: 10/18/2007 10:30:00 AM
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
noah_mendelsohn writes:
> UPA "Advantages":
> a) makes it easier for database-mapping, programming language binding,
> user-interface generation tools, etc. to statically determine what a
> schema will and won't accept. In certain respects, UPA restricts schemas=
> to things that are relatively easier to bind than what you get without
> UPA.
> b) makes it easier to apply the deterministic validation algorithms, such=
> as those that were used in many XML 1.0 validators
c) It makes the worst-case time complexity of subsumption checking
between two content models linear (as opposed to exponential).
ht
=2D --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i...
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged sp=
am]
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHFxmRkjnJixAXWBoRAqAPAJ9TFdGhqzabCSM3O0i/HNdl0eD/+ACfdJXz
QoJNF4/+HieyRxSrNXL3dHQ=
=eCRi
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From andrew.j.welch@g... Thu Oct 18 09:26:13 2007
Received: from maggie.w3 | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
