Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - RE: optional, but at least one required [Thread Next] Re: optional, but at least one requiredTo: "Michael Kay" <mike@--------.--->,"'George Cristian Bina'" <george@---------.--->, <vwiswell@-------.---> Date: 10/10/2007 8:06:00 AM
Michael, you are exactly right. I think I figured it out, though:
<xsd:element name="parent">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:choice>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element ref="a"/>
<xsd:element ref="b"/>
</xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element ref="a"/>
<xsd:element ref="b"/>
</xsd:choice>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
I kept getting a Unique Particle Attribution rule error for 'a' in
Stylus Studio. I found a post somewhere that said that this was a bug,
and when I used Sax, it validated just fine.
If you have a better way of doing it, I'd love to see it. Thanks so
much for your help, guys.
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:17:28 +0100
"Michael Kay" <mike@s...> wrote:
> George, your reading of the requirement is very literal.
>
> "I have a and b, at least one of them has to appear once AND ONLY
>ONCE."
>
> My guess at the likely meaning is to accept a|b|ab. But I might be
>wrong.
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xmlschema-dev-request@w...
>> [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w...] On Behalf Of George
>> Cristian Bina
>> Sent: 10 October 2007 08:42
>> To: vwiswell@v...
>> Cc: xmlschema-dev@w...
>> Subject: Re: optional, but at least one required
>>
>>
>> Hi Virginia,
>>
>> I understand that what you want is
>> ab* | a*b
>> and you need to write that in a non ambiguous way to be able
>> to write it in XML Schema.
>>
>> So what we need to accept is
>>
>> a ab abb abbb ...
>> b ab aab aaab ...
>>
>>
>> You can write that as
>>
>> ((a, (b* | (a+, b))) | b)
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> George
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> George Cristian Bina - http://aboutxml.blogspot.com/
>> <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger
>> www.---.com
>>
>>
>> Virginia Wiswell wrote:
>> > I have a similar situation that I'm having trouble with. I
>> have a and
>> > b, at least one of them has to appear once AND ONLY ONCE. a
>> must come before b.
>> > The examples in this thread allow more than one occurrence
>> of a or b.
>> >
>> > This is my first attempt at customizing a schema and I'm stuck.
>> >
>> > TIA, Virginia
>> >
>> >> You need to specify the requirements in a little more detail:
>> >>
>> >> * are multiple occurrences of a, b, and c allowed?
>> >>
>> >> * what constraints do you want to impose on the ordering
>> of the elements?
>> >>
>> >> Michael Kay
>> >> http://www.saxonica.com/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
From petexmldev@t... Wed Oct 10 18:23:18 2007
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([193.51.208.68])
by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exi | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
