Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: pattern facet implementations

From: "Michael Kay" <mike@--------.--->
To: "'Shlomo Yona'" <S.Yona@--.--->, <xmlschema-dev@--.--->
Date: 9/23/2007 8:56:00 PM
Saxon has an internal API that you could use to test patterns against
strings without creating complete schemas and instance documents.
 
Essentially:
 
import net.sf.saxon.java.JRegularExpression;
 
JRegularExpression regex = new JRegularExpression("[A-Z]", false, 0);
if (regex.matches("A")) ...
 
Internally Saxon is translating the schema-syntax regex into either JDK 1.4
or JDK 1.5 regex syntax, and then using the JDK regex engine underneath. The
translators are derived from code written and published by James Clark,
fairly substantially modified. The 1.4 and 1.5 versions differ because JDK
1.5 changed "." to match a surrogate pair rather than matching each half of
a surrogate pair.
 
This should work in Saxon-B, there's no need to install the schema-aware
product. (That's because the same code is also used to support XPath 2.0
regular expression handling).
 
It's probably also possible, but not quite so easy, to access the
corresponding methods on Saxon's .NET product, which use the Microsoft .NET
regular expression engine as the target. 
 
It's possible that other schema processors are using the combination of
James Clark's translation routines with the JDK regex engine; but there are
still going to be significant differences between the implementations.
 
Michael Kay


  _____  

From: xmlschema-dev-request@w... [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w...] On
Behalf Of Shlomo Yona
Sent: 23 September 2007 19:15
To: xmlschema-dev@w...
Subject: pattern facet implementations



Hello,

 

Are there implementations of xsd:pattern facet available as stand-alone or
as a modular component that can be integrated into a test environment or a
schema processor?

 

I'd like to run tests on a pattern facet implementation and cross reference
the results with other implementations of this schema feature for
functionality and performance.

 

Also, are there XML Schema processors that use the same "engines" for
patterns? I'd rather test against different implementations rather than the
same one.

 

Thanks.

 

Shlomo.



transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent