Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: Why does the default namespace not apply to attributes?

From: Nanda Kol <nandakol@-------.--->
To: Michael Kay <mike@--------.--->, <noah_mendelsohn@--.---.--->
Date: 8/20/2007 12:12:00 PM
> There are lots of things that one might want to do =0A=
differently given a chance, but it's etched in stone and there's no prospec=
t of =0A=
changing it in fundamental ways. XML Schema has to work with the base =0A=
specs as they exist, not as one might like to redesign them (even if everyo=
ne =0A=
were to agree that you were right, which is unlikely).=0A=
=0A=
Please, don't misunderstand my question; it is absolutely not my=0A=
intention to suggest changes to the XML spec, rather my aim is to to=0A=
find out what is the rationale for the difference between elements and=0A=
attributes with regard to the default namespace. We are struggling with=0A=
the question whether or not elements and attributes in one XML schema shoul=
d be in the=0A=
same namespace. This is an aspect being discussed as part of the guidelines=
 that we are developing within our organization. To provide a rationale for=
 our choice (disregard whether the answer is YES or NO) is important for th=
e acceptance and actual usage of the guidelines by our readers (who are XML=
 developers), more important than the answer itself.Why we are contacting t=
his forum, is because we presume that W3C has encountered the same question=
s years ago and it would be useless to invent the wheel twice.Best regards,=
Nanda=0A=
From: mike@s...: nandakol@h...; noah_mendelsohn@u...=
CC: xmlschema-dev@w...: RE: Why does the default namespace not app=
ly to attributes?Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:27:45 +0100=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
>Wouldn=92t it be more =0A=
intuitive and improve readability to have both of the attributes in a diffe=
rent =0A=
namespace, instead of one attribute being in no namespace? =0A=
The XML Namespaces spec =0A=
has been with us since 1999. There are lots of things that one might want t=
o do =0A=
differently given a chance, but it's etched in stone and there's no prospec=
t of =0A=
changing it in fundamental ways. XML Schema has to work with the base =0A=
specs as they exist, not as one might like to redesign them (even if everyo=
ne =0A=
were to agree that you were right, which is unlikely).=0A=
 =0A=
Michael Kay=0A=
http://www.saxonica.com/=0A=

_________________________________________________________________
With Windows Live Hotmail, you can personalize your inbox with your favorit=
e color.
www.windowslive-hotmail.com/learnmore/personalize.html?locale=en-us&ocid=
=TXT_TAGLM_HMWL_reten_addcolor_0607=


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent