![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: Discrepancies in the W3C Schema docs? [Thread Next] RE: Discrepancies in the W3C Schema docs?To: "'Pete Cordell'" <petexmldev@--------------.--->, "'Henry S. Thompson'" <ht@---.--.--.--> Date: 6/12/2007 12:05:00 PM Section 4.3.6: For all datatypes .derived. by .list. the value of whiteSpace is collapse and cannot be changed by a schema author. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: xmlschema-dev-request@w... > [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w...] On Behalf Of Pete Cordell > Sent: 12 June 2007 10:51 > To: Henry S. Thompson > Cc: Dan Maharry; xmlschema-dev@w... > Subject: Re: Discrepancies in the W3C Schema docs? > > > ----- Original Message From: "Henry S. Thompson" > <ht@i...> Pete Cordell writes: > > >> I've always assumed that the lexical space is > pre-normalization, but > >> I can't at the moment find anything that tells me this either way. > > > In W3C XML Schema, all constraints are applied _after_ > normalisation > > of white space. > > Thanks for that. > > Exploring further... If you made IDREFS an element's contents > (not recommended, but not disallowed), and you overrode the > whitespace facet to be preserve, thus allowing you to have > multiple intervening whitespace after validation, > would/should the result still be interpreted as a valid > IDREFS (i.e. a list of IDREF values)? > > Is so, IDREFS is not always defined as having only a single > intervening space char; correct? > > Cheers, > > Pete. > -- > ============================================= > Pete Cordell > Codalogic Ltd > for XML Schema to C++ data binding visit > http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/ > ============================================= > > > From petexmldev@t... Tue Jun 12 13:27:39 2007 Received: from aji.w3.org ([133.27.22 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | |||
|
