Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: Defining recursive elements? >Thread Next - RE: Defining recursive elements? Re: Defining recursive elements?To: Boris Kolpackov <boris@-------------.---> Date: 5/21/2007 12:53:00 PM
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Boris Kolpackov writes:
> Any studies to support these numbers? I just did a quick check over
> a bunch of real-world schemas in our repository. Out of 18 schemas,
> 7 are "unqualified" (~40%) and 11 are "qualified" (~60%).
In my collection of schema documents, I find
753 qualified
220 [not specified, defaults to unqualfied]
49 unqualified
ht
=2D --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i...
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged sp=
am]
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGUXopkjnJixAXWBoRAgDzAJ0QB6OWfJyf0ZZ4BHDiXGQuP1U0wQCdH5XQ
00wiF2peR7r20A1j13JrEZo=
=WWCb
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From stylusstudio@g... Mon May 21 12:28:51 2007
Received: from wiggum.w3 | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
