 |
|
|
The WG discussed this 2007-03-28. It is tracked as bugzilla #4346.
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Conclusions:
There is no rule in the specification that forbids referring to attribut=
es
in the http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance namespace.
However, as shown, schema document is not valid because it lacks an impo=
rt.
The specification requires imports, which serve a dual purpose of
identifying the resource containing the schema definitions (unnecessary =
in
this case) and licensing the import of definitions from that namespace.
However, note that even if the schema were valid, it would be ineffectiv=
e.
The rules in Validation Rule: Element Locally Valid (Complex Type) mean
that the attribute use settings such as default values will not have any=
effect because they are not consulted for the attributes in the
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance namespace.
For the WG
//Mary
|
|
| |
These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.
| |
| |
|
|
|
