Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - SV: Any wildcard and the .NET validator? >Thread Next - SV: SV: Any wildcard and the .NET validator? Re: SV: Any wildcard and the .NET validator?To: Bryan Rasmussen <BRS@----.--> Date: 10/8/2006 8:39:00 PM I think that is an excellent assessment Bryan. I wonder which is right? It is interesting that every other validator I have tried passes the document. I haven't tried Saxon, and it seems my Altova is broken... must fix that... Thanks! Jeff Bryan Rasmussen wrote: > > I should probably note that I don't 100% agree with this reasoning, I s= uppose > that what should be processed laxly is the content of description, not = any > the sequence of elements under description. But I do think the reasonin= g can > be understood. > > Cheers, > Bryan Rasmussen > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: Bryan Rasmussen > Sendt: 9. oktober 2006 09:41 > Til: 'lists@j...'; xmlschema-dev@w... > Emne: SV: Any wildcard and the .NET validator? > > > Well, if "A wildcard provides for =B7validation=B7 of attribute and ele= ment > information items dependent on their namespace name, but independently = of > their local name." (under wildcards > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#Wildcards ) Then I suppose the positi= on is > that a text node is not allowable as an any. > > The position is then also I suppose that Description is the element tha= t uses > DescriptionType, it is defined as having any number of elements in the = xhtml > namespace and processing should be lax if you happen to run into an ele= ment > in say the RDF namespace. But here they are running into a textnode und= er > description, description is not processed laxly therefore Description r= aises > an error. > > > At any rate, this is what I figure they position is. > > > Cheers, > Bryan Rasmussen > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: xmlschema-dev-request@w... > [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w...]P=E5 vegne af Jeff Rafter > Sendt: 6. oktober 2006 21:01 > Til: xmlschema-dev@w... > Emne: Any wildcard and the .NET validator? > > > > Does anyone here have information on the .NET XML Schema validator and = > their position on lax validation of wildcards? > > i.e.: > > <complexType name="DescriptionType" mixed="true"> > <sequence> > <any minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" > namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" processContents="l= ax"/> > </sequence> > </complexType> > > <description xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Blah > Blah<html:em>blah</html:em>.<html:br/>Blah<html:strong>blah</html:stron= g> > blah!</description> > > Works in everything except the .NET tools (even MSXML passes the > document...). > > Thanks, > Jeff > > > From xan.gregg@j... Mon Oct 09 13:10:22 2006 Received: from maggie.w3.org ([193.51.208.68]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp ( | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
