Do people have good experiences using Substitution Groups
in conjunction with Databinding tools? 

Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: Boris Kolpackov [mailto:boris@c...]
Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 7:38 AM
To: Simon.Cox@c...
Cc: paul@x...; David_E3@V...; mike@s...; =
xmlschema-dev@w...; lists@j...; Downey,P,Paul,XSB2 R
Subject: Re: Xml Schema profile
 
Hi,

Simon.Cox@c... <Simon.Cox@c...> writes:

> Please do not labour under the impression that substitution groups are =
a
> corner of the spec that rarely gets visited.

I was also somewhat surprised seeing this assumption. I did a quick =
search
on our XML Schema repository which brought up the following well-known
schemas besides the opengeospatiol.org's ones (GML, etc.):

OVAL (Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language) / =
http://oval.mitre.org
FpML (Financial products Markup Language) / http://www.fpml.org
COLLADA (COLLAborative Design Activity) / http://www.collada.org
HR-XML / http://www.hr-xml.org


hth,
-boris


-- 
Boris Kolpackov
Code Synthesis Tools CC
http://www.codesynthesis.com
Open-Source, Cross-Platform C++ XML Data Binding


From xmlschema@s... Mon Sep 25 09:00:01 2006
Received: from lisa.w3.