noah_mendelsohn@u... wrote:
> And, adding to Mike's answer, the schema workgroup is devoting a lot of 
> effort to choosing the right features for Schema 1.1 that would allow just 
> such co-occurrence constraints to be expressed.  Though I can't officially 
> commit anything, I would expect to see at least some initial proposals in 
> whatever is the next public working draft of the Schema 1.1 specification. 
>  Stay tuned.
> 

hi,

I'm playing with an alternate schema technology that can build content 
models dynamically, as shown in this example :
http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/tutorial.html#N801359

Thus, co-occurrence constraints are easy to achieve with the Active 
Schema Language :
http://disc.inria.fr/perso/philippe.poulard/xml/active-tags/active-schema/active-schema.html

Of course, this is still experimental, but it's worth seeing ; there are 
lots of ideas that might interest the schema workgroup.

-- 
Cordialement,

               ///
              (. .)
  --------ooO--(_)--Ooo--------
|      Philippe Poulard       |
  -----------------------------
  http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/
        Have the RefleX !


From xml1@l... Tue May 16 15:30:25 2006
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([1