>Archive Index
>xmlschema-dev Archive Home
>Recent entries

>Thread Prev - SV: [xml-dev] Two Questions - on XML Schema
[Thread Next]

RE: [xml-dev] Two Questions - on XML Schema

From: "Michael Kay" <mike@--------.--->
To: "'Bryan Rasmussen'" <BRS@----.-->, "'Rick Jelliffe'" <rjelliffe@-------.---.-->, <noah_mendelsohn@--.---.--->
Date: 3/9/2006 3:45:00 PM

> I agree somewhat. Some months back there was a thread where I 
> argued that
> instead of extending XML Schema with co-occurence constraints 
> there should be
> some work done on how to connect XML Schema better with Schematron.

Using two different languages with very different conceptual approaches to
detecting and reporting validation errors is OK as a pragmatic way of coping
with today's realities, but it's hard to believe that we can't come up with
something better. 
> 
> One thing that I can think of straight off the bat if XML 
> Schema went towards
> defining bindings to Schematron of some sort then xsd:unique could be
> dropped. Dropping syntax is also a benefit. 

It's not exactly a benefit to the many people who are already using that
syntax.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/




From Paul.V.Biron@k... Thu Mar 09 16:39:56 2006
Received:

>Thread Prev - SV: [xml-dev] Two Questions - on XML Schema
[Thread Next]

>Archive Index
>xmlschema-dev Archive Home
>Recent entries

Altova Mailing List Archives

RE: [xml-dev] Two Questions - on XML Schema