Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: xsd:simpletype or >Thread Next - Re: xsd:simpletype or Re: xsd:simpletype or To: ht@---.--.--.-- (----- -. --------),--- ---- <-----@-----.---> Date: 1/11/2006 11:55:00 PM
At 01:54 AM 1/12/2006, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>Typo? You can extend _either_ of these types to get a complex type
>defn with simple content and attributes.
I'll have to check into this more. This was in terms of redfine - my
original statement. It seemed that if the type was not defined as a complex
type, that I could not redefine it to have a new attribute. If my element
is based upon a simpleType, I can only restrict the definition in redefine,
while if it is the complex definition, I can add attributes as needed as
well as restricting it's facets.
..dan
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Danny Vint
Specializing in Panoramic Images of California and the West
http://www.dvint.com
voice: 510-522-4703
When H.H. Bennett was asked why he preferred to be out
shooting landscapes rather than spending time in his portrait studio:
"It is easier to pose nature and less trouble to please."
http://www.portalwisconsin.org/bennett_feature.cfm
From george@o... Thu Jan 12 16:23:41 2006
Received: from | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
