Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: performance testing of schemas

From: "Michael Kay" <mike@--------.--->
To: "'Henry S. Thompson'" <ht@---.--.--.-->, "'Bryan Rasmussen'" <brs@----.-->
Date: 12/8/2005 4:26:00 PM
> My experience is that schema 'compilation' completely swamps 
> schema-based
> 'validation', so the first thing to do in any performance testing is
> to separate these two phases.

With this in mind I've been thinking about "lazy" or incremental compilation
of schemas, to avoid compiling the parts that aren't used in a particular
validation episode.

Is it conformant to use a schema for validating instances without reporting
the errors that appear in unused parts of the schema?

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/



From noah_mendelsohn@u... Thu Dec 08 17:08:40


transparent
Print
Mail
Digg
delicious
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent