So, of course, after I read this, I realize that the complexType "foo1"
is unnecessarily complicated in the example I gave.  This is because I
need to add attributes to the "foo" element
	(i.e. <foo name="foo_name">some_value</foo>)

Thanks again,
-kevin

On Nov 8, 2005, at 11:18 PM, Kevin Y. Kim (Lists) wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to define a schema that will support the following:
>
> 1    <some_xml>
> 2        <foo>some_value</foo>
> 3        <foo>
> 4            <bar>another_value</bar>
> 5        <foo>
> 6        <foo>third_value</foo>
> 7    </some_xml>
>
> Now, I know how to defined the schema for each case:
>     For 2 & 6:
>         <xsd:complexType name="foo1">
>             <xsd:simpleContent>
>                 <xsd:extension type="xsd:string"/>
>             </xsd:simpleContent>
>         </xsd:complexType>
>
> 	For 3 - 5:
>         <xsd:complexType name="foo2">
>             <xsd:sequence>
>                 <xsd:element name="bar" type="xsd:string"/>
>             </xsd:sequence>
>         </xsd:complexType>
>
> But how would I defined a schema to encompass both?
>
> Thanks,
> -kevin
>
>
>


From george@s... Wed Nov 09 07:55:12 2005
Received: from aji.w3.org ([133.27.2