> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandy Gao [mailto:sandygao@c...] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 16:35
> To: Alessandro Triglia
> Cc: 'ML-xml-schema-dev'
> Subject: RE: min occurs
> 
> 
> 
> Hi. Trying to reply to both your messages in the thread. 
> 
> > I would like to reply to Sandy that ...
> 
> As you can probably tell, I was just moving issues around 
> instead of raising them. So I'd rather you say "reply to bug 
> 2222". :-) 
> 
> > Why wasn't the {max occur} property of particles just 
> specified as a *positive* integer?  Am I missing something obvious? 
> 
> Did you mean "Either a positive integer or unbounded"? (We do 
> need the "unbounded" value.) 


Yes.


> Then I agree: "positive" makes 
> more sense than "non-negative" because we never allow 0. And 
> we can kill that 2.2 clause about {max occurs} must >= 1. 


Exactly.


> 
> It's up to you to either add your comments to bug 2222 or 
> open a new one [1] if you think they are sufficiently different. 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=XML%20Schema 
> 
> > The second issue above (beginning with "I also noticed the 
> following...") is
> > not reported in Sandy's bug report.
> 
> You are right. I vaguely remember seeing this comment before, 
> but couldn't find it anywhere. Feel free to open a new bug. 


Thank you,

Alessandro


> 
> Thanks,
> Sandy Gao
> XML Parser Development, IBM Canada
> (1-905) 413-3255
> sandygao@c...
> 




From thm@p... Tue Oct 18 01:43:46 2005
Received: from wiggum.w3.org ([128.30.52.23])
	b