Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: [Fwd: Extending RSS 2.0]

From: "Michael Kay" <mike@--------.--->
To: "'Borut Bolcina'" <bob@-----.-->, <xmlschema-dev@--.--->
Date: 10/7/2005 10:44:00 AM
I don't know if it was your comment or someone else asking the same
question, but the advice given was to write a schema that defines the =
rules
for your own elements and import the RSS schema into your own. Since the
wildcard specifies lax validation, it will validate your elements =
against
their declarations. However, it will not prevent the appearance of =
elements
for which there is no declaration, and it will not constrain the order =
of
these elements.
 
If you want something stricter than this, you could define your own =
element
job:item and put it in the substitution group of the RSS item, with a
content model that's defined as an extension of the original. The =
instance
would then, of course, have to specify job:item rather than item.
 
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/


  _____  

From: xmlschema-dev-request@w... [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w...] =
On
Behalf Of Borut Bolcina
Sent: 07 October 2005 08:19
To: xmlschema-dev@w...
Subject: [Fwd: Extending RSS 2.0]


Hi again,

I finally branched back to this task. Huh, those managers.

My job namespace elements are now being validated against external =
schema.
But, as RSS 2.0 schema allows any element (see below), I can not control
which of job namespace elements are mandatory or their order if that =
would
matter.

So there is no other option then to use my own schema based on RSS 2.0. =
I
thought I could avoid changing the original. Am I wrong?

Regards,
Borut

-------- Original Message -------- 
Subject: 	Extending RSS 2.0=09
Date: 	Mon, 26 Sep 2005 16:16:08 +0200=09
From: 	Borut Bol=E8ina  <mailto:bob@n...> <bob@n...>=09
To: 	xmlschema-dev@w...=09


Hello,



if I extend RSS 2.0 with some additional <item> elements in my own job: 

namespace like this:



<item>

   <title>Job title</title>

   <link>http://link/to/some/job</link>

   <description>Job description.</description>

   <enclosure url="http://some.domain.com/img/logo.jpg"
<http://some.domain.com/img/logo.jpg>  

type="image/jpeg" length="34566"/>

   <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:25:10 +0200</pubDate>

   <job:company>Acme ltd.</job:company>

   <job:work-area>Job work area</job:work-area>

   <job:type>type of job</job:type>

   <job:education>level of education</job:education>

   <job:location region="some region">town</job:location>

   <job:expires>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:25:10 +0200</job:expires>

</item>



it validates perfectly ok with 

http://www.thearchitect.co.uk/schemas/rss-2_0.xsd. Understandably, as



<xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" 

maxOccurs="unbounded">

   <xs:annotation>

       <xs:documentation>Extensibility element.</xs:documentation>

   </xs:annotation>

</xs:any>



is allowing this. Now, how do I enforce rules for my job: elements? The 

basis for validation would be the above xsd, which would allow inclusion =


of different new sets of elements and namespaces (one of them being 

job:, the other maybe commerce:).



How to do this right?



Regards,

Borut





transparent
Print
Mail
Digg
delicious
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent