![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - [Fwd: Extending RSS 2.0] [Thread Next] RE: [Fwd: Extending RSS 2.0]To: "'Borut Bolcina'" <bob@-----.-->, <xmlschema-dev@--.---> Date: 10/7/2005 10:44:00 AM I don't know if it was your comment or someone else asking the same
question, but the advice given was to write a schema that defines the =
rules
for your own elements and import the RSS schema into your own. Since the
wildcard specifies lax validation, it will validate your elements =
against
their declarations. However, it will not prevent the appearance of =
elements
for which there is no declaration, and it will not constrain the order =
of
these elements.
If you want something stricter than this, you could define your own =
element
job:item and put it in the substitution group of the RSS item, with a
content model that's defined as an extension of the original. The =
instance
would then, of course, have to specify job:item rather than item.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
_____
From: xmlschema-dev-request@w... [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w...] =
On
Behalf Of Borut Bolcina
Sent: 07 October 2005 08:19
To: xmlschema-dev@w...
Subject: [Fwd: Extending RSS 2.0]
Hi again,
I finally branched back to this task. Huh, those managers.
My job namespace elements are now being validated against external =
schema.
But, as RSS 2.0 schema allows any element (see below), I can not control
which of job namespace elements are mandatory or their order if that =
would
matter.
So there is no other option then to use my own schema based on RSS 2.0. =
I
thought I could avoid changing the original. Am I wrong?
Regards,
Borut
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Extending RSS 2.0=09
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 16:16:08 +0200=09
From: Borut Bol=E8ina <mailto:bob@n...> <bob@n...>=09
To: xmlschema-dev@w...=09
Hello,
if I extend RSS 2.0 with some additional <item> elements in my own job:
namespace like this:
<item>
<title>Job title</title>
<link>http://link/to/some/job</link>
<description>Job description.</description>
<enclosure url="http://some.domain.com/img/logo.jpg"
<http://some.domain.com/img/logo.jpg>
type="image/jpeg" length="34566"/>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:25:10 +0200</pubDate>
<job:company>Acme ltd.</job:company>
<job:work-area>Job work area</job:work-area>
<job:type>type of job</job:type>
<job:education>level of education</job:education>
<job:location region="some region">town</job:location>
<job:expires>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:25:10 +0200</job:expires>
</item>
it validates perfectly ok with
http://www.thearchitect.co.uk/schemas/rss-2_0.xsd. Understandably, as
<xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Extensibility element.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:any>
is allowing this. Now, how do I enforce rules for my job: elements? The
basis for validation would be the above xsd, which would allow inclusion =
of different new sets of elements and namespaces (one of them being
job:, the other maybe commerce:).
How to do this right?
Regards,
Borut
| ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | |||||
|
