![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Advice, please: Restricting wild cards in anonymous types [Thread Next] Re: Advice, please: Restricting wild cards in anonymous typesTo: "Grimaldi, Linda L." <Linda.L.Grimaldi@----.---> Date: 10/7/2005 10:34:00 AM
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Grimaldi, Linda L. writes:
> I am working with a "standard" schema that allows <xs:any,
> namespace="##other" ... in its complex types. The problem I am having
> is that, since the complex types are anonymous, I don't seem to be able
> to restrict (or extend) them in the usual way. Is there any way around
> this issue, some other way to restrict the xs:any to a specific element
> that is local to my own namespace?
Named or not, the only way to _change_ what the content model of the
containing element allows is by redefining a type -- in your case, the
first named type definition which itself contains the element
declaration with the anonymous type definition.
ht
=2D --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i...
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged sp=
am]
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDRjLvkjnJixAXWBoRAtA3AJ9+nb7jVwYuVTVn1Oic+UcbdPedhACfegy/
IyN4eIc2ZSuxEgBkcNjI6nU=
=gUB3
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From mike@s... Fri Oct 07 08:44:03 2005
Received: from maggie.w3 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | |||||
|
