Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: chairs' summary of XML Schema User Experiences workshop

From: Paul.V.Biron@--.---
To: mcham@---------.---
Date: 7/12/2005 8:14:00 AM
> >From what I understand from talking to participants and reading the
> minutes, "only weak support, however, for proposals to drop XML Schema
> 1.1 from the Working Group's task list" is somewhat backwards.  There
> was only weak support for finishing XML 1.1 according to the table in
> the minutes. (11 people thought it was something W3C should do, compared
> to 23 who wanted a focus on errata, 22 who wanted a focus on a test
> suite, 21 who wanted the Wiki).  Similarly, 18 participants said they
> would contribute to the Wiki, but only 5 said they would send people to
> the WG to finish 1.1. 

Of the ~20 who wanted a focus on errata/test suite/wiki, only a few 
expressed the desire to drop 1.1 altogether.  There's a big difference 
between saying "focus on this" and "don't do that".

pvb

From cmsmcq@a... Tue Jul 12 23:13:06 2005
Rec


transparent
Print
Mail
Digg
delicious
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent