![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xmlschema-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: Use of key/keyref - any best practices? warnings? >Thread Next - RE: Use of key/keyref - any best practices? warnings? Re: Use of key/keyref - any best practices? warnings?To: Nigel Hardy <nwh@----.--.--> Date: 7/27/2005 7:26:00 AM > This is a pain and feels wrong when you have to do it - though the need > for it is obvious on reflection. The XPath steps do need prefixing. An > issue with this is that you will get the schema parsed and the > constraints you want will (silently) not be imposed if you forget the > prefixes. Agreed. Except that I think it feels wrong because nothing else in the spec works this way. QNames are already present in other locations, why does the default namespace not apply to the XPath steps in content? No don't answer that... I know I know... it's just that it *should* work :) All the best, Jeff Rafter From mike@s... Sun Feb 27 23:29:17 2 | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | |||||
|
